The Implementation of Lean Six Sigma Principles to Improve the Value of Care Delivery for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients: The Perioperative Institute of Surgical Excellence Experience. Issue 21 (1st November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: El-Othmani, Mouhanad M.; Crespi, Zachary; Pallekonda, Vinay; Sayeed, Zain; Saleh, Khaled J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Volume 29:Issue 21(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11-01
• Subjects: Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; Joint Diseases -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery; Orthopedics; Periodicals; 616.7005
• DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00497
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-151X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: With the projected increase in the volume of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), minimizing variations in surgery times, hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge dispositions, and inhospital complication rates would help reduce costs and improve the quality of care. As the move toward bundle payment models gains further traction, providers will be reimbursed based on the quality and cost associated with the surgical episode. As such, it remains critical to design and implement high-quality cost-effective perioperative delivery care models. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology has been well described in the healthcare field as a superior strategy in designing processes aimed at reducing waste while minimizing error rates. We present an institutional experience with the design and implementation of a LSS quality improvement process specific to the TJA pathway, with a hypothesis of expected decrease in case cancellation rate, inhospital LOS, 30-day readmissions, and inpatient rehabilitation utilization after program implementation. Methods: In 2017, the Perioperative Institute of Surgical Excellence (PISE) program for lower limb TJA was designed and implemented at our institution over a 4-month duration. The program was designed following LSS principles as a low-cost easily adoptable model with a goal to reduce hospital LOS, case cancellation rate, 30-day readmissions, and inpatient rehabilitation utilization. Results: A total of 328 patients (128 total hip arthroplasty and 200 total knee arthroplasty) were included in PISE compared with a total of 255 patients (106 total hip arthroplasty and 149 total knee arthroplasty) for the preimplementation cohort. After implementation of the model, and compared with a similar 4-month preimplementation duration, the pilot results revealed an increase in monthly case load by 28.6%, decrease in the 30-day readmission rate by 1.16%, inpatient rehabilitation utilization by 60%, a reduction of the average LOS by 0.8 days, and a case cancellations decrease by 51%. Conclusion: The implementation of the pilot protocol for PISE within our institution was successful in decreasing LOS, inpatient rehabilitation utilization, 30-day readmission, and case cancellation. Further assessment is needed to ascertain sustainability of the protocol over a longer duration and generalizability of the results at different institutions and surgeons.