Using surround DIC to extract true stress–strain curve from uniaxial tension experiments. (15th April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jordan, Benoit; Grolleau, Vincent; Mohr, Dirk
• Is Part Of: International journal of solids and structures. Volume 268(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-04-15
• Subjects: Stereo digital image correlation -- Uniaxial tension -- Strain hardening -- Surround DIC -- Plasticity; Mechanics, Applied -- Periodicals; Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals; Elastic solids -- Periodicals; Mécanique appliquée -- Périodiques; Constructions, Théorie des -- Périodiques; Solides élastiques -- Périodiques; Elastic solids; Mechanics, Applied; Structural analysis (Engineering); Periodicals; 624.18
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112171
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-7683

Abstract

Highlights: Average stress versus local axial strain yields reasonable estimate of post-necking hardening response. Demonstrated validity of stress–strain curve estimate through numerical simulations. Performed uniaxial tension and bulge tests for experimental validation. Stress–strain curve obtained from uniaxial tension experiments of DP780 steel for strains as high as 0.5. Abstract: The exact stress–strain curve can be directly identified from uniaxial tension experiments up to the point of onset of diffuse necking. To gain insight into the post-necking hardening response of metals, other experimental methods such as the bulge, compression or torsion experiments are typically employed. Here, we introduce the idea of using surround DIC to obtain accurate specimen shape measurements of tensile specimens with rectangular gage section. Based on the results from a series of detailed three-dimensional finite element simulations of ASTM E8 type of uniaxial tension experiments on a wide spectrum of steel and aluminum behaviors, it is proposed to combine the history of the axial strain on the surface at the specimen center with the average axial stress to extract the stress–strain curve for strains of up to axial true strain of 1. The estimation uncertainty of this stress–strain curve estimation procedure is of the same order as that of the associated experimental uncertainties. This result is validated through an additional computational study for more than 100 distinct hardening behaviors. Furthermore, a surround DIC system composed of four stereo DIC systems is built and used to determine the stress–strain curve for a 1.5 mm thick DP780 steel. In addition, bulge experiments are performed on the same material revealing a good agreement of the post-necking hardening behavior determined through uniaxial and bulge testing.