Comparison of vessel fractional flow reserve with invasive resting full-cycle ratio in patients with intermediate coronary lesions. (15th April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lake, Philipp; Halbach, Marcel; Kardasch, Michelle; Mauri, Victor; Baldus, Stephan; Adam, Matti; Wienemann, Hendrik
• Is Part Of: International journal of cardiology. Volume 377(2023)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 8
• Publication Date: 2023-04-15
• Subjects: Coronary artery disease -- Vessel fractional flow reserve -- Invasive coronary angiography -- Resting full-cycle ratio; AUC Area under the curve -- FFR Fractional flow reserve -- FPS Frames per second -- iFR Instantaneous wave-free ratio -- IQR Interquartile range -- LAD Left anterior descending artery -- NHPRs Non-hyperemic pressure ratios -- Pa Proximal aortic pressure -- Pd Distal arterial pressure -- RFR Resting full-cycle ratio -- ROC Receiver operating characteristics -- QCA Quantitative coronary angiography -- vFFR Vessel fractional flow reserve; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.01.062
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-5273

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) is a novel angiography-derived index for the assessment of myocardial ischemia without the need for pressure wires and hyperemic agents. vFFR has demonstrated very good diagnostic performance compared with the hyperemic index fractional flow reserve (FFR). The aim of this study was to compare vFFR to the non-hyperemic pressure ratio resting full-cycle ratio (RFR). Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study of an all-comer cohort undergoing RFR assessment. Invasive coronary angiography was obtained without a dedicated vFFR acquisition protocol, and vFFR calculation was attempted in all vessels interrogated by RFR (1483 lesions of 1030 patients). Results: vFFR could be analyzed in 986 lesions from 705 patients. Median diameter stenosis was 37% (interquartile range (IQR): 30.0–44.0%), vFFR 0.86 (IQR: 0.81–0.91) and RFR 0.94 (IQR: (0.90–0.97). The correlation between vFFR and RFR was strong ( r = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66–0.74, p < 0.001). Using RFR ≤0.89 as reference, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy for vFFR were 77%, 93%, 77%, and 92% and 89%. vFFR yielded a high area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.94). The good diagnostic performance of vFFR was confirmed among subgroups of patients with diabetes, severe aortic stenosis, female gender and lesions located in the left anterior descending artery. Conclusion: vFFR has a high diagnostic performance taking RFR as the reference standard for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenoses. Highlights: vFFR has a high diagnostic accuracy with invasive RFR to identify functional significance of coronary stenoses. The good diagnostic performance of vFFR was maintained among subgroups of patients with diabetes, severe aortic stenosis, female gender and lesions located in the left anterior descending artery. vFFR is a promising novel non-invasive tool that may be used in a broad range of clinical settings.