A negative association between nectar standing crop and pollen transfer suggests nectar functions as a manipulator of pollinating bats. (29th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Domingos-Melo, Arthur; Cocucci, Andrea A; Tschapka, Marco; Machado, Isabel C
• Is Part Of: Annals of botany. Volume 131:Number 2(2023)
• Page Start: 361
• Page End: 372
• Publication Date: 2022-12-29
• Subjects: Bat pollination -- Caatinga dry forest -- chiropterophily -- floral nectar -- Harpochilus neesianus Ness -- nectar standing crop -- nectar removal effect -- pollen delivery -- pollinator manipulation; Botany -- Periodicals; 580
• DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcac154
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-7364

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aims: Nectar standing crop has a fundamental role in controlling pollinator movements between flowers and individuals within a population. In bat pollination systems, plants take advantage of the cognitive abilities of nectarivorous bats, which integrate complex perceptions of the quality and spatial distribution of resources. Here, we propose that associations between standing crop and pollen transfer help to reveal the role of nectar as a manipulator of pollinator behaviour. Methods: We used Harpochilus neesianus Ness (Acanthaceae), a bat-pollinated shrub from the Brazilian Caatinga, as a model system to assess nectar removal effects and standing crop, respectively, over the night and to test associations between the amount of nectar available to pollinators, and pollen import and export. Key Results: Harpochilus neesianus showed continuous nectar secretion throughout the flower lifespan. Flowers subjected to successive nectar removals produced less nectar than flowers sampled just once, and showed, despite a higher sugar concentration, a lower absolute amount of sugar. Under these conditions, bats may realize that nectar production is decreasing after repeated visits to the same flower and could be manipulated to avoid such already pollinated flowers with little nectar, thus increasing the probability of visits to flowers with a high amount of nectar, and a still high pollen availability on anthers and low pollen deposition on stigmas. We found that during most of the period of anthesis, nectar standing crop volume was positively correlated with the number of pollen grains remaining in the anthers, and negatively with the number of pollen grains deposited on the stigma. Conclusions: Nectar secretion patterns can function as a manipulator of pollinating bats in H. neesianus . We propose that the assessment of variability in nectar secretion in response to removal, and the correlation between nectar standing crop and relative pollen transfer throughout anthesis should be considered in order to understand the role of nectar in the manipulation of pollinators.