Percutaneous artErial closure devices and ultrasound‐guided Trans‐femoRal puncture ObservatioNal InvestigatiOn: Insights from the PETRONIO registry. Issue 3 (17th June 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Percutaneous artErial closure devices and ultrasound‐guided Trans‐femoRal puncture ObservatioNal InvestigatiOn: Insights from the PETRONIO registry. Issue 3 (17th June 2021)
- Main Title:
- Percutaneous artErial closure devices and ultrasound‐guided Trans‐femoRal puncture ObservatioNal InvestigatiOn: Insights from the PETRONIO registry
- Authors:
- Iannopollo, Gianmarco
Nobile, Giampiero
Lanzilotti, Valerio
Capecchi, Alessandro
Verardi, Roberto
Bruno, Matteo
Somaschini, Alberto
Rubboli, Andrea
Di Pasquale, Giuseppe
Casella, Gianni - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the safety of a single and combined use of ultrasound‐guided femoral puncture (U) and percutaneous arterial closure devices (P) in femoral artery procedures (FAP) compared to fluoroscopic guidance (F) and manual compression (M) in a large radial‐focused interventional centre. Background: U and P, taken individually, have improved safety in femoral arterial access procedures compared to traditional techniques. Methods: All FAP performed between July 2017 and December 2018 in our centre were divided into three phases: (a) control period with F and M mainly performed; (b) phase out period where U and P were introduced; (c) intervention period where a 6‐month expertise on the novel techniques was acquired. The overall population was further stratified into subgroups: F/M, U/M, F/P, U/P. The primary study endpoint was in‐hospital access site bleeding events (BE) according to the BARC criteria. The secondary endpoint was vascular site complications (VASC). Results: Four hundred eighteen procedures (14%) out of 3025 were performed via FA access during the study period. The overall access‐site in‐hospital BE were 97 (23%). Decreasing rates of BE (phase 1: n = 46, 29%; phase 2: n = 38, 22% e phase 3: n = 13, 15%; p = 0.027) and VASC were observed during the three periods. BE occurred significantly more often in F/M group (F/M: n = 48; 32%; U/M: n = 12, 16%; F/P: n = 18, 21%; U/P: n = 19, 17%; p = 0.008). F/M subgroup was an independentAbstract: Objective: To evaluate the safety of a single and combined use of ultrasound‐guided femoral puncture (U) and percutaneous arterial closure devices (P) in femoral artery procedures (FAP) compared to fluoroscopic guidance (F) and manual compression (M) in a large radial‐focused interventional centre. Background: U and P, taken individually, have improved safety in femoral arterial access procedures compared to traditional techniques. Methods: All FAP performed between July 2017 and December 2018 in our centre were divided into three phases: (a) control period with F and M mainly performed; (b) phase out period where U and P were introduced; (c) intervention period where a 6‐month expertise on the novel techniques was acquired. The overall population was further stratified into subgroups: F/M, U/M, F/P, U/P. The primary study endpoint was in‐hospital access site bleeding events (BE) according to the BARC criteria. The secondary endpoint was vascular site complications (VASC). Results: Four hundred eighteen procedures (14%) out of 3025 were performed via FA access during the study period. The overall access‐site in‐hospital BE were 97 (23%). Decreasing rates of BE (phase 1: n = 46, 29%; phase 2: n = 38, 22% e phase 3: n = 13, 15%; p = 0.027) and VASC were observed during the three periods. BE occurred significantly more often in F/M group (F/M: n = 48; 32%; U/M: n = 12, 16%; F/P: n = 18, 21%; U/P: n = 19, 17%; p = 0.008). F/M subgroup was an independent predictor of BE both in multivariable analysis and propensity score matching analysis. Conclusions: The introduction of ultrasound‐guided femoral puncture and percutaneous arterial closure devices has reduced access site bleedings with a progressive improvement after the first 6 months learning period. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. Volume 99:Issue 3(2022)
- Journal:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
- Issue:
- Volume 99:Issue 3(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 99, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 99
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0099-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 795
- Page End:
- 803
- Publication Date:
- 2021-06-17
- Subjects:
- access site bleeding -- femoral artery -- ultrasound guided puncture -- vascular closure device
Heart -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Cardiac catheterization -- Periodicals
616.1207572 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-726X ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ccd.29828 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-1946
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3092.992000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26139.xml