National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults. Issue 1 (24th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Simon, Hillary L.; Reif de Paula, Thais; Spigel, Zachary A.; Keller, Deborah S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Volume 70:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 126
• Page End: 135
• Publication Date: 2021-09-24
• Subjects: colorectal surgery -- minimally invasive surgery -- older persons -- persons 65 years and older -- rectal cancer -- robotic surgery; Geriatrics -- Periodicals; 618.97
• DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17467
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-8614

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is safe and improves outcomes in older persons with rectal cancer but may be underutilized. As older persons are the largest surgical population, investigation of the current use and factors impacting MIS use is warranted. Our goal is to investigate the trends and disparities that affect utilization of MIS in older persons with rectal cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was reviewed for persons 65 years and older who underwent curative resection for rectal adenocarcinoma from 2010 to 2017. Cases were stratified by surgical approach (open or MIS [laparoscopic or robotic]). Univariate analysis compared patient and provider demographics across approaches. Multivariate analysis investigated variables associated with MIS use. Main outcome measures were trends and factors associated with MIS use in older persons. RESULTS: Of 31, 910 patients analyzed, 51.9% ( n = 16, 555) were open and 48.1% ( n = 15, 355) MIS. The MIS cohort was 66.7% ( n = 10, 236) laparoscopic and 33.3% ( n = 5119) robotic. MIS increased from 29% in 2010 ( n = 1197; 25% laparoscopic, 4% robotic) to 65% in 2017 ( n = 2382; 35% laparoscopic, 30% robotic), likely from annual increases in robotics (OR 1.24/year, p < 0.0001). In the unadjusted analysis, there were significant differences in MIS use by age, race, comorbidity, socioeconomic status, and facility type. In multivariate analysis, patients with advancing age (OR 0.93, p < 0.001), major comorbidity (OR 0.75, p < 0.001), total proctectomy (OR0.78, p < 0.001), and advanced pathologic stage (OR 0.51, p < 0.001) were less likely to undergo MIS. CONCLUSION: Nationwide, less than half of rectal cancer cases in older persons were performed with MIS, despite steady robotic growth. Patient and facility factors impacted MIS use. Further work on regionalizing rectal cancer care and ensuring equitable MIS access and training could improve utilization.