Molecular characterisation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with NTRK fusions and review of the literature. Issue 3 (28th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Allen, Michael J; Zhang, Amy; Bavi, Prashant; Kim, Jaeseung C; Jang, Gun Ho; Kelly, Deirdre; Perera, Sheron; Denroche, Rob E; Notta, Faiyaz; Wilson, Julie M; Dodd, Anna; Ramotar, Stephanie; Hutchinson, Shawn; Fischer, Sandra E; Grant, Robert C; Gallinger, Steven; Knox, Jennifer J; O'Kane, Grainne M
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical pathology. Volume 76:Issue 3(2023)
• Page Start: 158
• Page End: 165
• Publication Date: 2021-09-28
• Subjects: pancreatic neoplasms -- genes -- neoplasm -- pathology -- molecular; Pathology -- Periodicals; Pathology, Molecular -- Periodicals; 616.0705
• DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207781
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9746

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: The majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) harbour oncogenic mutations in KRAS with variants in TP53, CDKN2A and SMAD4 also prevalent. The presence of oncogenic fusions including NTRK fusions are rare but important to identify. Here we ascertain the prevalence of NTRK fusions and document their genomic characteristics in a large series of PDAC. Methods: Whole genome sequencing and RNAseq were performed on a series of patients with resected or locally advanced/metastatic PDAC collected between 2008 and 2020 at a single institution. A subset of specimens underwent immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. Clinical and molecular characterisation and IHC sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. Results: 400 patients were included (resected n=167; locally advanced/metastatic n=233). Three patients were identified as harbouring an NTRK fusion, two EML4-NTRK3 ( KRAS -WT) and a single novel KANK1-NTRK3 fusion. The latter occurring in the presence of a subclonal KRAS mutation. Typical PDAC drivers were present including mutations in TP53 and CDKN2A . Substitution base signatures and tumour mutational burden were similar to typical PDAC. The prevalence of NTRK fusions was 0.8% (3/400), while in KRAS wild-type tumours, it was 6.25% (2/32). DNA prediction alone documented six false-positive cases. RNA analysis correctly identified the in-frame fusion transcripts. IHC analysis was negative in the KANK1-NTRK3 fusion but positive in a EML4-NTRK3 case, highlighting lower sensitivity of IHC. Conclusion: NTRK fusions are rare; however, with emerging therapeutic options targeting these fusions, detection is vital. Reflex testing for KRAS mutations and subsequent RNA-based screening could help identify these cases in PDAC.