Effectiveness and safety of generic tofacitinib in spondyloarthritis: A real‐world retrospective analysis from India. (20th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Phatak, Sanat; Khenat, Aditya; Malandkar, Mansi; Amin, Sanjiv
• Is Part Of: International journal of rheumatic diseases. Volume 26:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: 487
• Page End: 492
• Publication Date: 2023-01-20
• Subjects: generic -- registry -- South Asia -- spondyloarthritis -- tofacitinib; Rheumatology -- Periodicals; Rheumatology -- Asia -- Periodicals; Rheumatology -- Pacific Area -- Periodicals; Rheumatic Diseases -- Periodicals; Connective Tissue Diseases -- Periodicals; Immune System Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.723
• DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.14570
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1756-1841

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Clinical trial evidence demonstrates the efficacy of tofacitinib in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Real‐world data from spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients are scarce; there are few reports of its effectiveness and safety from low‐ to middle‐income countries like India, despite its widespread usage. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory records of 100 patients with SpA prescribed generic tofacitinib from a single center in Mumbai, India. Disease activity was measured using the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C‐Reactive Protein (ASDAS‐CRP) in all patients, along with disease‐specific outcome measures in the subgroups. We used paired t test for response to tofacitinib. We compared Δ ASDAS‐CRP in patients with active peripheral arthritis and in patients without. We defined clinical tofacitinib failure as the physician's decision to change or add a disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), and performed logistic regression to identify factors associated with tofacitinib failure. Results: Among 100 patients (71 male, median age 42.5 years), 57 had axial SpA, 10 had peripheral SpA, 4 had inflammatory bowel disease‐SpA and 29 had PsA. One‐third had received biologic DMARDs previously. Patients received tofacitinib for a median of 192 days. There was a significant improvement in ASDAS‐CRP in all types of SpA. Patients with active peripheral arthritis had a significantly greater fall in ASDAS‐CRP. There were no serious adverse events, 19 patients had mild COVID‐19; no patient had tuberculosis. Ten patients had tofacitinib failure; no baseline parameter could predict failure. Interpretation: In the real‐world setting, generic tofacitinib showed good effectiveness and tolerable safety profile in Indian patients with SpA.