Examination of the pharmacokinetics and differential inhibition of cyclooxygenase isoenzymes in New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) by the Non‐Steroidal anti‐inflammatory Robenacoxib. Issue 2 (7th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jeffrey, Alison; Gardhouse, Sara; Kleinhenz, Michael; Hocker, Samuel E.; Weeder, Mikaela; Montgomery, Shawnee R.; Zhang, Yuntao; Porting, Anna; Rooney, Tess
• Is Part Of: Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics. Volume 46:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 103
• Page End: 111
• Publication Date: 2022-12-07
• Subjects: COX‐2 selective inhibitor -- Oryctolagus cuniculus -- pharmacology -- rabbit -- Robenacoxib; Veterinary pharmacology -- Periodicals; Therapeutics -- Periodicals; 636.0895105
• DOI: 10.1111/jvp.13105
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0140-7783

Abstract

Abstract: Effective rabbit analgesia is challenging, and there are few studies available on the newer COX‐2 selective NSAIDs, such as robenacoxib. This study aimed to establish the pharmacokinetics of oral and subcutaneous robenacoxib, describe its inhibitory actions on COX enzymes, and develop dosing, using six healthy New Zealand white rabbits. Pharmacokinetics were determined from plasma concentrations after oral administration of robenacoxib (0.83–0.96 mg/kg) and also after subcutaneous administration (2 mg/kg). The inhibitory actions of robenacoxib were evaluated by measuring plasma concentrations of thromboxane B2 (TBX2 ) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2 ) as surrogate markers of cyclooxygenase enzyme isoform inhibition. The mean maximum concentration for oral and subcutaneous administration was 0.23 μg/ml and 5.82 μg/ml, respectively. Oral robenacoxib administration did not demonstrate a significant difference between any time point for PGE2 or TBX2, though subcutaneous administration did for both. There was no significant difference in PGE2 or TBX2 concentrations at any time point when comparing subcutaneous versus oral routes. Although the results support that plasma robenacoxib exceeds the therapeutic levels compared to dogs and cats, there was little significance in the difference in the changes associated with COX‐1 and COX‐2 inhibition. Further studies are warranted to determine appropriate dosing, safety, and efficacy in rabbits.