Application of human data to predict hamstring tendon autograft diameter in Zhuang population. (27th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Huang, Xiao‐Li; Zheng, Hong‐Yu; Yang, Hui‐Hui; Shi, Ze‐Feng; Zhang, Bing; Lan, Bei; Wang, Hong; Tan, Ru‐Xin
• Is Part Of: International journal of rheumatic diseases. Volume 26:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: 464
• Page End: 470
• Publication Date: 2022-12-27
• Subjects: ACL reconstruction -- gracilis tendon -- graft -- hamstring tendon -- prediction -- semitendinosus tendon -- ultrasound -- Zhuang nationality; Rheumatology -- Periodicals; Rheumatology -- Asia -- Periodicals; Rheumatology -- Pacific Area -- Periodicals; Rheumatic Diseases -- Periodicals; Connective Tissue Diseases -- Periodicals; Immune System Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.723
• DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.14545
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1756-1841

Abstract

Abstract: Background: To explore the value of human data from the Zhuang population via predicting the diameter of the hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and determining the feasibility of preoperative ultrasound for prediction. Methods: In total, 24 Zhuang patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with a 4‐strand semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autograft (4 S‐STG) were enrolled in this study. Before the operation, the affected semitendinosus tendon (ST) was examined by ultrasonography, and its length, diameter, cross‐sectional area, and circumference were measured. The patients' basic information and body data, ie, height, weight, body mass index, lower limb length injured, and thigh circumference injured, were recorded. Their ST and gracilis tendon lengths and diameters and 4 S‐STG diameter were measured during the operation. A correlation analysis was conducted between the ultrasound measurement results and human data and intraoperative tendon measurements. Results: The ST diameter measured by ultrasound was correlated with the ST length and ST diameter measured during operation, and the ST circumference measured by ultrasound was correlated with the ST diameter measured during operation. The patients' body weight can be used to distinguish a 4 S‐STG diameter of ≥8 mm ( P < .01, mean difference = 11.59). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of body weight was 0.829. The final graft diameter ≥8 mm could be predicted with a body weight of 61.5 kg as the cutoff point; the sensitivity and specificity were 72.2% and 83.3%, respectively. Conclusion: In Zhuang patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with 4 S‐STG, body weight more accurately predicted graft diameter than preoperative semitendinosus diameter.