A Calibrated Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies with Application to the Effect of Second-Hand Smoke Exposure on Blood Lead Levels in Children. Issue 5 (28th August 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Calibrated Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies with Application to the Effect of Second-Hand Smoke Exposure on Blood Lead Levels in Children. Issue 5 (28th August 2020)
- Main Title:
- A Calibrated Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies with Application to the Effect of Second-Hand Smoke Exposure on Blood Lead Levels in Children
- Authors:
- Zhang, Bo
Small, Dylan S. - Abstract:
- Summary: We conducted a matched observational study to investigate the causal relationship between second-hand smoke and blood lead levels in children. Our first analysis that assumes no unmeasured confounding suggests evidence of a detrimental effect of second-hand smoke. However, unmeasured confounding is a concern in our study as in other observational studies of second-hand smoke's effects. A sensitivity analysis asks how sensitive the conclusion is to a hypothesized unmeasured confounder U . For example, in our study, one potential unmeasured confounder is whether the child attends a public or private school. A commonly used sensitivity analysis for matched observational studies adopts a worst-case perspective, which assumes that, in each matched set, the unmeasured confounder is allocated to make the bias worst: in a matched pair, the child with higher blood lead level always attends public school and the other private school. This worst-case allocation of U does not correspond to any realistic distribution of U in the population and is difficult to compare with observed covariates. We proposed a new sensitivity analysis method that addresses these concerns. We apply the new method to our study and find that, to explain away the association between second-hand smoke exposure and blood lead levels as non-causal, the unmeasured confounder would have to be a bigger confounder than any measured confounder.
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Volume 69:Issue 5(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society
- Issue:
- Volume 69:Issue 5(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 69, Issue 5 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 69
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0069-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1285
- Page End:
- 1305
- Publication Date:
- 2020-08-28
- Subjects:
- Calibration -- Matched observational studies -- Second-hand smoke -- Sensitivity analysis
Statistics -- Periodicals
519.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9876/ ↗
https://academic.oup.com/jrsssc ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/rssc.12443 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0035-9254
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1580.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26085.xml