Strategic organisational skills predict surgical training success. Issue 1155 (12th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: James, Osian Penri; Robinson, David Bryan Thomas; Hopkins, Luke; Bowman, Chris; Powell, Arfon; Brown, Chris; Hemington-Gorse, Sarah; Egan, Richard John; Lewis, Wyn G
• Is Part Of: Postgraduate medical journal. Volume 98:Issue 1155(2022)
• Page Start: 29
• Page End: 34
• Publication Date: 2020-11-12
• Subjects: Surgery -- Medical education & training; Medicine -- Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138763
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0032-5473

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Surgical career progression is determined by examination success and Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) outcome, yet data on organisational skills are sparse. This study aimed to determine whether organisational skills related to Core Surgical Training (CST) outcome. Primary outcome measures include operative experience, publications, examination success (Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons or the Diploma in Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (MRCS/DO-HNS)) and ARCP outcome. Methods: The study was conducted prospectively at three consecutive CST induction boot camps (2017–2019) providing clinical and simulation training for 125 trainees. Arrival time at course registration was the selected surrogate for organisational skills. Trainees were advised to arrive promptly at 8:45 for registration and that the course would start at 9:00. Trainee arrival times were grouped as follows: early (before 8:45), on time (8:45–8:59am) or late (after 9:00). Arrival times were compared with primary outcome measures. Setting: Health Education and Improvement Wales' School of Surgery, UK. Results: Median arrival time was 8:53 (range 7:55–10:03), with 29 trainees (23.2%) arriving early, 63 (50.4%) on-time and 33 (26.4%) late. Arrival time was associated with operative experience (early vs late; 206 vs 164 cases, p=0.012), publication (63.2% vs 18.5%, p=0.005), MRCS/DO-HNS success (44.8% vs 15.2%, p=0.029), ARCP outcome (86.2% vs 60.6% Outcome 1, p=0.053), but not National Training Number success (60.0% vs 53.3%, p=0.772). Conclusions: Better-prepared trainees achieved 25% more operative experience, were four-fold more likely to publish and pass MRCS, which aligned with consistent desirable ARCP outcome. Timely arrival at training events represents a skills-composite of travel planning and is a useful marker of strategic organisational skills.