The contribution of space objects insurance regulations to space traffic management. Issue 1 (March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Luinaud, Mathieu; Salmon, Virgile
• Is Part Of: Journal of space safety engineering. Volume 10:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 112
• Page End: 121
• Publication Date: 2023-03
• Subjects: Space Traffic Management -- Space Debris -- Space Insurance -- Third Party Liability -- Space Sustainability; Astronautics -- Periodicals; Space flight -- Periodicals; Space flight -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Space flight -- Safety regulations -- Periodicals; Astronautics -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Astronautics -- Safety regulations -- Periodicals; 629.4
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsse.2022.12.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2468-8967

Abstract

Abstract: In this article, we argue that properly defined insurance regulations for the operation of space objects can become a building block of a sustainable space traffic management (STM) system. we look at Third Party Liability (TPL) insurance requirements asked by regulators at the time of licensing the operators of a space object and consider their impact on STM. The Liability Convention (1972) has States liable for damages dealt to third parties by operators they have licensed. A collision might result in potentially high financial costs, and States now take into consideration potential future financial liabilities when licensing spacecrafts. This has led to an increase in the number of States requiring the subscription, by operators of a space object, of a TPL insurance prior to authorizing the licensing of a space activity. We currently observe a variety of applicable regimes with regards to TPL insurance requirements: some states mandate it for all space objects, like the UAE, while others have requirements that can be waived in specific cases like the UK for smallsats. Others, like the USA don't mandate any TPL insurance for in-orbit activities and make them a voluntary-based subscription, while mandating it for launch and re-entry operations. TPL insurance typically varies based on risk exposure created by the licensed spacecrafts, the reliability of its operator, and risk mitigation measures put in place ex-ante and ex-post the spacecraft's launch. As such, underlying mechanics share common ground with STM metrics. Requiring the subscription of a TPL insurance has pros and cons. Requiring TPL insurance might reduce attractiveness by creating financial and administrative burdens on operators registering activities in a given country. On the other side, we believe such an obligation creates positive outcomes that directly contribute to a better STM regime. Firstly, it is expected that TPL insurance requirement regimes will induce operators in being more vigilant when conceiving systems and assuming operations of spacecrafts in order to provide guarantees that will reduce the TPL insurance paid to insurers. Secondly, imposing requirements forces regulators to improve their understanding of STM fundamentals and therefore contributes to bringing STM issues in the daily operations of licensing authorities. Thirdly, it will force markets to include a financial metric into STM by creating insurance products.