Changes in the health systems and policy environment for maternal and newborn health, 2008–2018: An analysis of data from 78 low-income and middle-income countries. (March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stierman, Elizabeth K.; Maliqi, Blerta; Mary, Meighan; Dohlsten, Martin AJ.; Katwan, Elizabeth; Moran, Allisyn C.; Creanga, Andreea A.
• Is Part Of: Social science & medicine. Volume 321(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-03
• Subjects: Maternal health -- Newborn health -- Health policy -- Health systems -- LMICs; Social medicine -- Periodicals; Medical anthropology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine sociale -- Périodiques; Anthropologie médicale -- Périodiques; Santé publique -- Périodiques; Psychologie -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115765
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-9536

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Political, social, economic, and health system determinants play an important role in creating an enabling environment for maternal and newborn health. This study assesses changes in health systems and policy indicators for maternal and newborn health across 78 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) during 2008–2018, and examines contextual factors associated with policy adoption and systems changes. Methods: We compiled historical data from WHO, ILO, and UNICEF surveys and databases to track changes in ten maternal and newborn health systems and policy indicators prioritized for tracking by global partnerships. Logistic regression was used to examine the odds of systems and policy change based on indicators of economic growth, gender equality, and country governance with available data from 2008 to 2018. Results: From 2008 to 2018, many LMICs (44/76; 57·9%) substantially strengthened systems and policies for maternal and newborn health. The most frequently adopted policies were national guidelines for kangaroo mother care, national guidelines for use of antenatal corticosteroids, national policies for maternal death notification and review, and the introduction of priority medicines in Essential Medicines Lists. The odds of policy adoption and systems investments were significantly greater in countries that experienced economic growth, had strong female labor participation, and had strong country governance (all p < 0·05). Conclusions: The widespread adoption of priority policies over the past decade is a notable step in creating an environment supportive for maternal and newborn health, but continued leadership and resources are needed to ensure robust implementation that translates into improved health outcomes. Highlights: From 2008 to 2018, many LMICs adopted policies supportive of maternal and newborn health. Many adopted guidelines for kangaroo mother care and use of antenatal corticosteroids. Many also adopted national policies for maternal death notification and review. The odds of policy adoption were greater in certain contexts. Economic growth, gender equality, and governance may facilitate policy adoption.