Central haemodynamic abnormalities and outcome in patients with unexplained dyspnoea. (15th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Omote, Kazunori; Verbrugge, Frederik H.; Sorimachi, Hidemi; Omar, Massar; Popovic, Dejana; Obokata, Masaru; Reddy, Yogesh N.V.; Borlaug, Barry A.
• Is Part Of: European journal of heart failure. Volume 25:Number 2(2023)
• Page Start: 185
• Page End: 196
• Publication Date: 2022-12-15
• Subjects: Invasive haemodynamics -- Exercise haemodynamics -- Heart failure -- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction -- Outcome; Heart failure -- Periodicals; Heart Failure -- Periodicals; Insuffisance cardiaque -- Périodiques; Heart failure; Periodicals; 616.129005
• DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2747
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1388-9842

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: Little data are available regarding prognostic implications of invasive exercise testing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The present study aimed to investigate whether rest and exercise central haemodynamic abnormalities are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with dyspnea. Methods and results: Patients with exertional dyspnoea and ejection fraction ≥50% ( n = 764) underwent invasive exercise testing and follow‐up for heart failure hospitalization or death. There were 117 patients with events over a median follow‐up of 2.7 (interquartile range 0.5–4.6) years. Among patients with normal resting pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) (<15 mmHg, n = 380 [50%]), increased exercise PAWP (≥25 mmHg) was present in 187 (24% of cohort) and was associated with 2.4‐fold higher risk of events compared to those with normal exercise PAWP (<25 mmHg, n = 193 [25%]) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–5.36; p = 0.03), while patients with elevated resting PAWP (≥15 mmHg, n = 384 [50%]) displayed even higher risk compared to HFpEF with normal resting PAWP (HR 2.24; 95% CI 1.38–3.65; p = 0.001). Similar findings were observed for rest/exercise right atrial pressure, and rest/exercise pulmonary artery pressures. Higher peak oxygen consumption was associated with decreased risk of events, and this relationship was solely explained by exercise cardiac output. In a multivariable‐adjusted Cox model, each 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in exercise PAWP was associated with a 41% greater hazard of events (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.13–1.76; p = 0.002), while each 1 SD decrease in exercise cardiac output was associated with a 37% increased risk (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47–0.83; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Haemodynamic abnormalities currently used for diagnosis of HFpEF are associated with increased risk for adverse events. Treatments that reduce central pressures while improving cardiac output reserve may offer greatest benefit to improve outcomes in HFpEF. Abstract : Invasive exercise haemodynamic abnormalities currently used to diagnose or exclude heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are useful for risk stratification in patients with unexplained dyspnoea. AVO2 diff, arterial–venous oxygen content difference; CO, cardiac output; CPET, cardiopulmonary exercise testing; Ex, exercise; iCPET, invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing; NCD, non‐cardiac dyspnoea; PA, pulmonary artery; PAWP, pulmonary artery wedge pressure; PCWL, workload‐adjusted pulmonary artery wedge pressure; PH, pulmonary hypertension; RA, right atrial; RHC, right heart catheterization; VO2, oxygen consumption.