Asymmetric Contact Loss Dynamics during Plating and Stripping in Solid‐State Batteries. Issue 8 (28th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vishnugopi, Bairav S.; Naik, Kaustubh G.; Kawakami, Hiroki; Ikeda, Nobuhisa; Mizuno, Yoshifumi; Iwamura, Ryosuke; Kotaka, Toshikazu; Aotani, Koichiro; Tabuchi, Yuichiro; Mukherjee, Partha P.
• Is Part Of: Advanced energy materials. Volume 13:Issue 8(2023)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-12-28
• Subjects: contact loss -- electrochemical–mechanical interactions -- lithium metal anodes -- reaction heterogeneity -- solid–solid point contacts -- solid‐state batteries -- void formation; Energy harvesting -- Materials -- Periodicals; Energy conversion -- Materials -- Periodicals; Energy storage -- Materials -- Periodicals; Photovoltaics -- Periodicals; Fuel cells -- Periodicals; Thermoelectric materials -- Periodicals; 621.31
• DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202203671
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1614-6832

Abstract

Abstract: Solid‐state batteries (SSBs) hold the potential to improve energy density and offer enhanced safety when compared to lithium‐ion batteries. However, the development of practical SSBs faces major challenges, such as filament growth and void formation, which necessitate a comprehensive understanding of the intrinsic solid–solid interfaces and limiting mechanisms. In this work, the underpinning asymmetry in the mechanistic interplay and resulting interface dynamics during Li plating and stripping is demonstrated, illustrating the critical effect of reaction heterogeneity on the contact loss behavior. With increasing stripping rates, the manifestation of solid–solid point contacts is identified as a key descriptor that signifies a transition in electrochemical response from a regime of continuous contact decay to current constriction. It is revealed that contact loss can also occur during plating at the Li/Li6 PS5 Cl interface; this severity scales with the reaction heterogeneity and is identified as an important challenge toward achieving faster charging rates in SSBs. The distinct nature of competing electrochemical–mechanical interactions that govern void formation during plating/stripping are delineated in this work. Coupled with these intrinsic mechanisms, non‐uniformities in external pressure and temperature fields drastically alter the contact dynamics, resulting in disparate void localization patterns. Abstract : The underpinning asymmetry in the mechanistic interplay and resulting interface dynamics during lithium plating and stripping in solid‐state batteries is demonstrated. Contact loss during plating at the lithium/solid‐electrolyte interface is revealed and identified as an important challenge toward achieving fast charging. The severity of contact loss is critically dependent on the reaction heterogeneity at the solid/solid interface.