Feasibility and informativeness of the Canadian occupational performance measure for identifying priorities in patients with Parkinson's disease. (4th March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kobayashi, Eiji; Himuro, Nobuaki; Mitani, Yuji; Tsunashima, Takuya; Nomura, Kyouhei; Chiba, Susumu
• Is Part Of: Physiotherapy theory and practice. Volume 39:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: 607
• Page End: 614
• Publication Date: 2023-03-04
• Subjects: Parkinson's disease (PD) -- Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) -- patient-specific measurement tools -- international classification of functioning -- Disability and Health (ICF) -- priority; Physical therapy -- Periodicals; 615.82
• DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2021.2023926
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-3985

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and informativeness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) for identifying the priorities of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods: The COPM was administered in patients with PD who were admitted to the hospital. Feasibility was investigated by confirming the acceptability and practicality of the COPM interview. To investigate informativeness, identified priorities were classified according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and were cross-referenced with data from similar studies using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and the Patient-Specific Index for PD (PSI-PD). Results: All 61 patients who participated in this study completed the COPM, and a total of 197 priorities were identified. The most frequently identified priorities were "Recreation and leisure, " "Preparing meals, " "Walking, " "Doing housework, " and "Caring for household objects." The priorities identified using the PSFS and the PSI-PD were less diverse and focused on "Mobility" or "Self-care." Conclusions: The COPM is a feasible and informative tool for identifying priorities in patients with PD. Its informativeness was demonstrated by its ability to identify diverse priorities across the ICF domains of "Activity and participation" that had not been identified in the studies using the PSFS and PSI-PD.