Methods to Enhance Causal Inference for Assessing Impact of Clinical Informatics Platform Implementation. Issue 2 (2nd February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gaies, Michael; Olive, Mary K.; Owens, Gabe E.; Charpie, John R.; Zhang, Wenying; Pasquali, Sara K.; Klugman, Darren; Costello, John M.; Schwartz, Steven M.; Banerjee, Mousumi
• Is Part Of: Circulation. Volume 16:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: e009277
• Publication Date: 2023-02-02
• Subjects: causality inference -- critical care -- informatics -- outcomes assessment -- pediatric; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Research -- Periodicals; Outcome assessment (Medical care) -- Periodicals; Evidence-based medicine -- Periodicals; 616.1007
• DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009277
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1941-7713

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Hospitals are increasingly likely to implement clinical informatics tools to improve quality of care, necessitating rigorous approaches to evaluate effectiveness. We leveraged a multi-institutional data repository and applied causal inference methods to assess implementation of a commercial data visualization software in our pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. Methods: Natural experiment in the University of Michigan (UM) Cardiac Intensive Care Unit pre and postimplementation of data visualization software analyzed within the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium clinical registry; we identified N=21 control hospitals that contributed contemporaneous registry data during the study period. We used the platform during multiple daily rounds to visualize clinical data trends. We evaluated outcomes—case-mix adjusted postoperative mortality, cardiac arrest and unplanned readmission rates, and postoperative length of stay—most likely impacted by this change. There were no quality improvement initiatives focused specifically on these outcomes nor any organizational changes at UM in either era. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis to compare changes in UM outcomes to those at control hospitals across the pre versus postimplementation eras. Results: We compared 1436 pre versus 779 postimplementation admissions at UM to 19 854 (pre) versus 14 160 (post) at controls. Admission characteristics were similar between eras. Postimplementation at UM we observed relative reductions in cardiac arrests among medical admissions, unplanned readmissions, and postoperative length of stay by −14%, −41%, and −18%, respectively. The difference-in-differences estimate for each outcome was statistically significant ( P <0.05), suggesting the difference in outcomes at UM pre versus postimplementation is statistically significantly different from control hospitals during the same time. Conclusions: Clinical registries provide opportunities to thoroughly evaluate implementation of new informatics tools at single institutions. Borrowing strength from multi-institutional data and drawing ideas from causal inference, our analysis solidified greater belief in the effectiveness of this software across our institution.