Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Best Medical Treatment in the Late Time Window in Non-DEFUSE-Non-DAWN Patients: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Issue 3 (31st January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dittrich, Tolga D.; Sporns, Peter B.; Kriemler, Lilian F.; Rudin, Salome; Nguyen, Anh; Zietz, Annaelle; Polymeris, Alexandros A.; Tränka, Christopher; Thilemann, Sebastian; Wagner, Benjamin; Altersberger, Valerian L.; Piot, Ines; Barinka, Filip; Müller, Susanne; Hänsel, Martin; Gensicke, Henrik; Engelter, Stefan T.; Lyrer, Philippe A.; Sutter, Raoul; Nickel, Christian H.; Katan, Mira; Peters, Nils; Kulcsár, Zsolt; Karwacki, Grzegorz M.; Pileggi, Marco; Cereda, Carlo; Wegener, Susanne; Bonati, Leo H.; Fischer, Urs; Psychogios, Marios; De Marchis, Gian Marco;
• Is Part Of: Stroke. Volume 54:Issue 3(2023)
• Page Start: 722
• Page End: 730
• Publication Date: 2023-01-31
• Subjects: acute stroke -- patient selection -- reperfusion -- thrombectomy; Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals; Cerebral circulation -- Periodicals; 616.81
• DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039793
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0039-2499

Abstract

Abstract : Background: We assessed the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in adult stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion presenting in the late time window not fulfilling the DEFUSE-3 (Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours With Selection by Perfusion Imaging trial) and DAWN (Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours After Stroke With a Mismatch Between Deficit and Infarct trial) inclusion criteria. Methods: Cohort study of adults with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion admitted between 6 and 24 hours after last-seen-well at 5 participating Swiss stroke centers between 2014 and 2021. Mismatch was assessed by computer tomography or magnetic resonance imaging perfusion with automated software (RAPID or OLEA). We excluded patients meeting DEFUSE-3 and DAWN inclusion criteria and compared those who underwent MT with those receiving best medical treatment alone by inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score. The primary efficacy end point was a favorable functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score shift toward lower categories. The primary safety end point was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 7 days of stroke onset; the secondary was all-cause mortality within 90 days. Results: Among 278 patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion presenting in the late time window, 190 (68%) did not meet the DEFUSE-3 and DAWN inclusion criteria and thus were included in the analyses. Of those, 102 (54%) received MT. In the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, patients in the MT group had higher odds of favorable outcomes compared with the best medical treatment alone group (modified Rankin Scale shift: acOR, 1.46 [1.02–2.10]; P =0.04) and lower odds of all-cause mortality within 90 days (aOR, 0.59 [0.37–0.93]; P =0.02). There were no significant differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (MT versus best medical treatment alone: 5% versus 2%, P =0.63). Conclusions: Two out of 3 patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion presenting in the late time window did not meet the DEFUSE-3 and DAWN inclusion criteria. In these patients, MT was associated with higher odds of favorable functional outcomes without increased rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. These findings support the enrollment of patients into ongoing randomized trials on MT in the late window with more permissive inclusion criteria.