I Can for Kids: Experiences and Perceived Outcomes of a Summer Food Program for Low-Income Households at Risk of Food Insecurity in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. (7th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lee, Yun Yun; Caron-Roy, Stéphanie; Turko, Bobbi; Shearer, Jane; Barker, Donald; Campbell, David; Elliott, Charlene; Raine, Kim; Tyminski, Sheila; Olstad, Dana
• Is Part Of: Current developments in nutrition. Volume 5(2021)Supplement 2
• Page Start: 151
• Page End: 151
• Publication Date: 2021-06-07
• Subjects: Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Nutrition; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 612.3
• DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzab035_059
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2475-2991

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The prevalence of household food insecurity increases in the summer when school meals are no longer accessible, which can negatively impact children's health and wellbeing. Summer food programs, such as I Can for Kids (IC4K) in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, aim to reduce food insecurity in low income households with school-aged children during the summer months. Qualitative studies have not yet examined whether or how grocery gift cards (GGC) can reduce experiences of food insecurity among low-income households. We explored recipients' and agency staff experiences and perceived outcomes of receiving or distributing GGC from IC4K. Methods: This study used qualitative descriptive methodology. Data generation and analysis were guided by Freedman et al's theoretical framework of nutritious food access. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between August and November 2020 with 38 primary caregivers (i.e., GGC recipients) and 17 agency staff who distributed GGC. Directed content analysis was used to analyze the data from each set of interviews using a deductive-inductive approach. Codes were combined into themes that summarized GGC recipients' and agency staff's experiences and perceived outcomes of receiving or distributing GGC, and feedback to improve program delivery. Results: Three themes were generated from the data. The first theme was Financial Relief and reflected increased self-efficacy, improved diet quality, and reduced household stress from receiving GGC. The second theme was Social Connectedness and described enriched family relationships, enhanced rapport between staff and recipients, and increased recipient social capital. The last theme was Program Enhancements and described feedback to improve program delivery by extending program duration, increasing strategic direction to staff on GGC distribution, and additional promotional efforts to increase awareness of GGC availability. Conclusions: GGC recipients and agency staff perceived that GGC offered financial relief and enhanced social connections for recipients, and suggested areas for program improvements. Study findings can inform improvements to summer food programs that deliver GGC to reduce food insecurity among low-income households in the summer. Funding Sources: Funding provided by the O'Brien Institute for Public Health at the University of Calgary.