Total Energy and Macronutrient Intakes in Masters Athletes. (7th June 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Total Energy and Macronutrient Intakes in Masters Athletes. (7th June 2021)
- Main Title:
- Total Energy and Macronutrient Intakes in Masters Athletes
- Authors:
- Nichols, Quentin
Ramadoss, Rohit
Volpe, Stella - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Athletes subscribe to different energy and macronutrient intakes based on the needs of the sport. The aim of our study was to evaluate total energy and macronutrient intakes between different types of Masters athletes. Methods: Female and male Masters athletes participated in this cross-sectional study. Dietary consumption data were measured using Block's 2005 Food Frequency Questionnaire. A one-way analysis of variance was used to compare total energy, protein, carbohydrate, and fat (in grams [g]) intakes among the athletes. When significant differences were found, a Fisher's LSD post hoc test was performed to identify specific group differences. The significance level was set a priori at P < 0.05. Results: A total of 330 athletes (182 women and 148 men) were included in the study. Participants were 36.55 ± 11.2 years of age. The athlete population consisted of general athletes ( n = 81), runners ( n = 116), triathletes ( n = 53), rowers ( n = 46), and CrossFit athletes ( n = 34). Runners (1941.35 ± 697.25 kilocolaries [kcal]), triathletes (2031.65 ± 912.02 kcal), and rowers (2004.15 ± 978.42 kcal) all had significantly greater total energy intakes compared to CrossFit athletes (1538.80 ± 491.74 kcal) ( P < 0.05). Runners (226.21 ± 89.67 g) and triathletes (235.43 ± 134.29 g) had significantly greater carbohydrate intakes compared to CrossFit athletes (162.93 ± 66.99 g) ( P < 0.05). Rowers (83.31 ± 44.74 g) had a significantly greater proteinAbstract: Objectives: Athletes subscribe to different energy and macronutrient intakes based on the needs of the sport. The aim of our study was to evaluate total energy and macronutrient intakes between different types of Masters athletes. Methods: Female and male Masters athletes participated in this cross-sectional study. Dietary consumption data were measured using Block's 2005 Food Frequency Questionnaire. A one-way analysis of variance was used to compare total energy, protein, carbohydrate, and fat (in grams [g]) intakes among the athletes. When significant differences were found, a Fisher's LSD post hoc test was performed to identify specific group differences. The significance level was set a priori at P < 0.05. Results: A total of 330 athletes (182 women and 148 men) were included in the study. Participants were 36.55 ± 11.2 years of age. The athlete population consisted of general athletes ( n = 81), runners ( n = 116), triathletes ( n = 53), rowers ( n = 46), and CrossFit athletes ( n = 34). Runners (1941.35 ± 697.25 kilocolaries [kcal]), triathletes (2031.65 ± 912.02 kcal), and rowers (2004.15 ± 978.42 kcal) all had significantly greater total energy intakes compared to CrossFit athletes (1538.80 ± 491.74 kcal) ( P < 0.05). Runners (226.21 ± 89.67 g) and triathletes (235.43 ± 134.29 g) had significantly greater carbohydrate intakes compared to CrossFit athletes (162.93 ± 66.99 g) ( P < 0.05). Rowers (83.31 ± 44.74 g) had a significantly greater protein intake compared to CrossFit athletes (64.77 ± 21.32 g) ( P = 0.027). Rowers (87.35 ± 45.91 g) had a significantly greater fat intake compared to CrossFit athletes (68.86 ± 25.10 g) ( P = 0.041). Conclusions: Based on our data, runners, triathletes, and rowers all had greater total energy intake compared to CrossFit athletes. Rowers also consumed significantly more protein and fat than CrossFit athletes. Rowers may consume more protein and fat due to the combination of endurance and strength needed to meet the demands of the sport. Further research is needed to continue evaluating total energy and macronutrient intakes between different types of Masters athletes. Funding Sources: This project was unfunded. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Current developments in nutrition. Volume 5(2021)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Current developments in nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 5(2021)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 2 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0005-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 1296
- Page End:
- 1296
- Publication Date:
- 2021-06-07
- Subjects:
- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Nutrition
Periodicals
Periodicals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
612.3 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/cdn ↗
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/current-developments-in-nutrition ↗
https://cdn.nutrition.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cdn/nzab058_009 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2475-2991
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26040.xml