Unsupervised Diet Partitions Better Explain Variations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Individual Dietary Markers in U.S. Adults of the American Gut Project Cohort. (7th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cotillard, Aurélie; Chaumont, Soline; Saccareau, Mathilde; Litwin, Nicole S; Lopez, Diana Gutierrez; Tap, Julien; Lejzerowicz, Franck; Demaretz, Laetitia; McDonald, Daniel; Song, Se Jin; Knight, Rob; Cartier-Meheust, Agnès; Veiga, Patrick
• Is Part Of: Current developments in nutrition. Volume 5(2021)Supplement 2
• Page Start: 397
• Page End: 397
• Publication Date: 2021-06-07
• Subjects: Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Nutrition; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 612.3
• DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzab038_009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2475-2991

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Eating habits have been shown to impact the gut microbiome. Here we aimed to define several types of dietary patterns in a U.S. adult cohort and test their associations with the gut microbiome. Methods: Using supervised and unsupervised approaches, we built dietary patterns based on a food frequency questionnaire of the American Gut Project database. Focusing on 1800 adult participants living in the United States, we defined patterns as partitions (groups of participants) or factors (combinations of food variables) driven by specific dietary criteria: fibers, proteins, Healthy Eating Index (HEI 2010), food items, food groups and micronutrients. We then associated these patterns with 16S gut microbiome data for 744 participants, excluding those reporting antibiotic intake in the last year or specific diseases. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex and BMI. Results: Compared to individual features like fibers and proteins, or to factors representing reduced numbers of features, five unsupervised partitions based on food groups were best associated with gut microbiome beta-diversity. Two partitions presented a lower consumption of animal products, with one being almost completely exclusive and the other, close to a flexitarian diet, presenting the best diet quality as measured by HEI. A third one consisted mostly of participants under low carbohydrate diets with nearly no consumption of starchy foods or sweet products. Finally, the last two partitions presented Western-like diets with increased consumption of mixed dishes, sweet products and refined cereals, one of them being more diverse with increased nuts and whole cereals. Gut microbiome alpha-diversity was slightly increased in the flexitarian partition compared to the most westernized one. Strikingly, the low carbohydrate partition was associated with low levels of the Bifidobacterium genus. Conclusions: We showed in a U.S. adult cohort that a global diet may be more associated with gut microbiome variations than individual features like fibers or proteins. Five diet partitions were identified and their specific associations with gut microbiome were studied. These results confirm the importance to consider diet as a whole when studying gut microbiota diversity. Funding Sources: Danone Research.