989 Sustained and Further Improvements in Management of Open Fractures at a UK Major Trauma Centre. (12th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ramjeeawon, A; Iqbal, M; Abourisha, E; Ahmad, A; Hasan, Y; Hawthorne, R; Ashraf, A; Deakin, M
• Is Part Of: British journal of surgery. Volume 108:Supplement 6(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-10-12
• Subjects: Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab259.115
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1323

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To re-audit pre-operative hospital management of open fractures following further interventions (junior doctor education and awareness, editing of trauma clerking form), after the initial audit and interventions led to improvements in all parameters. Method: Pre-operative hospital management of open fractures was audited by reviewing patient notes using standards from the NICE (NG37) and BOAST/BAPRAS open fracture management guidelines. Patients included were treated by doctors with full exposure to the further interventions (due to junior doctor changeover the third cycle included fewer patients). Results: All parameters remained improved in the third audit cycle compared to the first (before interventions were implemented). The following results compare the second (n = 30) and third audit (n = 14) cycles. Patients receiving correct antibiotics (96%vs100%) and in a timely manner (<2 hours) where not given pre-hospital (46%vs60%) improved. Initial neurovascular assessment (93%vs100%), specifying nerves assessed (60%vs71%), assessing all relevant arteries (60%vs71%) and nerves (63%vs71%) and using Medical Research Council (MRC) grading in nerve assessment (3%vs71%) improved, while specifying arteries assessed was similar (87%vs86%). Post-manipulation, neurovascular assessment (93%vs75%) and appropriate nerve examination (90%vs50%) deteriorated, however appropriate vascular assessment (60%vs75%) and use of MRC grading in nerve assessment (0%vs50%) improved. Documentation where neurovascular assessment was not possible, initially (50%vs93%) and post-manipulation (40%vs50%) improved. Photo availability deteriorated (70%vs64%). Tetanus cover (87%vs100%) and appropriate dressing use (47%vs71%) improved. Conclusions: Most parameters showed sustained and further improvements. The haemodynamic stability variation of these patients may create difficulties in fully adhering to the management standard; in some cases, other acute concerns may take priority.