1350 Wide-Awake Local Anaesthetic No Tourniquet (WALANT) Vs General/Regional Anaesthetic for Flexor Tendon Injuries: A Single-Centre, Retrospective Cohort Study. (12th October 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 1350 Wide-Awake Local Anaesthetic No Tourniquet (WALANT) Vs General/Regional Anaesthetic for Flexor Tendon Injuries: A Single-Centre, Retrospective Cohort Study. (12th October 2021)
- Main Title:
- 1350 Wide-Awake Local Anaesthetic No Tourniquet (WALANT) Vs General/Regional Anaesthetic for Flexor Tendon Injuries: A Single-Centre, Retrospective Cohort Study
- Authors:
- Greasley, L
Patel, P
Nolan, G
Bamal, R
Bell, D - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: Flexor tendon repairs are commonly performed under general/regional anaesthesia. Wide-awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet (WALANT) has potential advantages including the ability to test the repair intra-operatively; removal of the risks of general anaesthesia; no aerosol generation, thus reducing COVID-19 transmission risk. An ongoing systematic review identified no comparative studies. This study aimed to compare the functional outcomes and complications of flexor tendon repairs under WALANT and general/regional anaesthetic. Method: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study was undertaken (July 2019-August 2020). Consecutive adult patients undergoing flexor tendon repair were included. Exclusion criteria were ≥ 3 injured fingers; concurrent hand fracture; revascularisation; replantation. Data were collected on demographics, injuries, operative technique, and outcomes. Results: Overall, 139 patients with 165 injured digits were included. Most (60%) were repaired under general anaesthesia. Local anaesthetic (was used for 46 patients (21 with tourniquet, 25 WALANT). Only 30% (42/139) patients had range of motion data at 6-weeks, dropping to 19% (26/139) at 12-weeks. WALANT patients had fewer ruptures (8% vs 14%), fewer adhesions requiring tenolysis (0% vs 4%) and less complications overall than the general/regional anaesthesia group. The results were not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions: The lack of data due to patients not attendingAbstract: Aim: Flexor tendon repairs are commonly performed under general/regional anaesthesia. Wide-awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet (WALANT) has potential advantages including the ability to test the repair intra-operatively; removal of the risks of general anaesthesia; no aerosol generation, thus reducing COVID-19 transmission risk. An ongoing systematic review identified no comparative studies. This study aimed to compare the functional outcomes and complications of flexor tendon repairs under WALANT and general/regional anaesthetic. Method: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study was undertaken (July 2019-August 2020). Consecutive adult patients undergoing flexor tendon repair were included. Exclusion criteria were ≥ 3 injured fingers; concurrent hand fracture; revascularisation; replantation. Data were collected on demographics, injuries, operative technique, and outcomes. Results: Overall, 139 patients with 165 injured digits were included. Most (60%) were repaired under general anaesthesia. Local anaesthetic (was used for 46 patients (21 with tourniquet, 25 WALANT). Only 30% (42/139) patients had range of motion data at 6-weeks, dropping to 19% (26/139) at 12-weeks. WALANT patients had fewer ruptures (8% vs 14%), fewer adhesions requiring tenolysis (0% vs 4%) and less complications overall than the general/regional anaesthesia group. The results were not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions: The lack of data due to patients not attending follow-up, makes meaningful research on flexor tendon injuries very challenging. This study suggests WALANT may reduce complications but is limited by the inherent bias of a retrospective, non-randomised study, and small numbers. Adequately designed and powered studies are recommended in future to further investigate the potential benefits of wide-awake surgery. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 108:Supplement 6(2021)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 108:Supplement 6(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 108, Issue 6 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 108
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0108-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-10-12
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bjs/znab258.057 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26032.xml