537 Open vs Closed Pilon Fractures: Comparison of Management, Outcomes, and Complications. (12th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lu, V; Zhang, J; Thahir, A; Lim, J A; Krkovic, M
• Is Part Of: British journal of surgery. Volume 108:Supplement 6(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-10-12
• Subjects: Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab259.997
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1323

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Despite the low incidence of pilon fractures, their high impact nature presents difficulties in surgical management/recovery. Current literature is varied, with no universal treatment algorithm. We aim to highlight differences in treatment, outcomes, complications between open and closed pilon fractures. Method: This retrospective study was conducted at a major trauma centre, including patients over 5-year period. 135 patients were included (open:48, closed:87). Primary outcome was AOFAS score at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-injury. Secondary outcomes include time to partial weight-bear (PWB) and full weight-bear (FWB), bone union time, follow-up time. Post-operative complications were collected. Results: Open fractures had lower AOFAS score 3 months post-injury, longer bone union time, and time to FWB. For both open and closed fractures, compared to ORIF patients, those treated with fine wire fixator (FWF) had lower AOFAS scores 3- and 6-months post-injury. Closed fracture patients treated with ORIF had shorter bone union time, time to PWB and FWB. Patients with AO/OTA 43A fractures needed shorter time to PWB and FWB than those with 43C fractures. Common complications (closed:open) were superficial infection (22%:54%), post-traumatic arthritis (25%:16%), non-union (11%:24%). Conclusions: Open fractures, with more extensive soft tissue damage, were likely more suited for FWF, rather than ORIF (18% of open vs 72% of closed were treated with ORIF). Due to greater associated trauma, more frequent complications, and delayed definitive fixation, open fractures had lower AOFAS scores. Nevertheless, use of staged approach involving temporary external fixation, followed with ORIF or FWF achieved low complication rates and good functional recovery.