Emergency medicine resident perspectives on well-being during COVID-19: a qualitative study. Issue 2 (28th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Agarwal, Anish; Sangha, Hareena; Deutsch, Amanda; Spadaro, Anthony; Gonzales, Rachel; Goldenring, Jacob; Mamtani, Mira; Conlon, Lauren W; Scott, Kevin
• Is Part Of: Emergency medicine journal. Volume 40:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 92
• Page End: 95
• Publication Date: 2022-09-28
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- education -- teaching -- teaching; Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212368
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1472-0205

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Emergency medicine (EM) clinician well-being has been negatively impacted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Resident physicians are particularly vulnerable yet less is known about their perspectives. Methods: The objective of this study was to use qualitative methods to understand EM residents' perspectives on well-being during COVID-19. EM residents at an urban, academic institution in the USA were recruited via email and participated in virtual, semi-structured interviews between November 2020 and February 2021. Interviews were conducted by a trained qualitative researcher, recorded, transcribed and de-identified by a third party vendor. All transcripts were double coded by two trained study team members using thematic analysis to identify the themes and interviews were stopped when no new themes emerged. Results: Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached with residents in their first 4 years of training: 6 postgraduate year (PGY)-1 (35%), 6 PGY-2 (35%), 2 PGY-3 (12%) and 3 PGY-4 (18%). Five themes were identified: (1) isolation from peers in training contrasting with a collective call to action, (2) desire for increased acknowledgement and structured leadership support, (3) concerns about personal needs and safety within the clinical environment, (4) fear of missed educational opportunities and lack of professional development and (5) need for enhanced mental and physical health resources. Conclusions: This qualitative study elucidated factors inside and outside of the clinical environment which impacted EM resident well-being. The findings suggest that programme and health system leadership can focus on supporting peer-to-peer and faculty connections, structured guidance and mentorship on resident career development and develop programmes which bolster resident on-shift support and acknowledgement. These lessons can be used by training programmes to better support residents, but the generalisability is limited due to the single-centre design and participation.