Magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS): an automated open-source tool for the ISMRM/NIST system phantom. (10th March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Korte, James C; Chin, Zachary; Carr, Madeline; Holloway, Lois; Franich, Rick
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 68:Number 6(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-03-10
• Subjects: magnetic resonance imaging -- quantitative biomarkers -- MRI system phantom -- technical validation -- open-source software; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acbcbb
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: Objective. To provide an open-source software for repeatable and efficient quantification of T 1 and T 2 relaxation times with the ISMRM/NIST system phantom. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) biomarkers have the potential to improve disease detection, staging and monitoring of treatment response. Reference objects, such as the system phantom, play a major role in translating qMRI methods into the clinic. The currently available open-source software for ISMRM/NIST system phantom analysis, Phantom Viewer (PV), includes manual steps that are subject to variability. Approach. We developed the Magnetic Resonance BIomarker Assessment Software (MR-BIAS) to automatically extract system phantom relaxation times. The inter-observer variability (IOV) and time efficiency of MR-BIAS and PV was observed in six volunteers analysing three phantom datasets. The IOV was measured with the coefficient of variation (CV) of percent bias (%bias) in T 1 and T 2 with respect to NMR reference values. The accuracy of MR-BIAS was compared to a custom script from a published study of twelve phantom datasets. This included comparison of overall bias and %bias for variable inversion recovery ( T 1 VIR ), variable flip angle ( T 1 VFA ) and multiple spin-echo ( T 2 MSE ) relaxation models. Main results. MR-BIAS had a lower mean CV with T 1 VIR (0.03%) and T 2 MSE (0.05%) in comparison to PV with T 1 VIR (1.28%) and T 2 MSE (4.55%). The mean analysis duration was 9.7 times faster for MR-BIAS (0.8 min) than PV (7.6 min). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall bias, or the %bias for the majority of ROIs, as calculated by MR-BIAS or the custom script for all models. Significance. MR-BIAS has demonstrated repeatable and efficient analysis of the ISMRM/NIST system phantom, with comparable accuracy to previous studies. The software is freely available to the MRI community, providing a framework to automate required analysis tasks, with the flexibility to explore open questions and accelerate biomarker research.