Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information. (July 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information. (July 2021)
- Main Title:
- Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information
- Authors:
- Xia, Jing
Niu, Wenju - Abstract:
- Highlights: We study the design of carbon-reducing contracts under asymmetric information. A menu of contracts is offered to induce the retailer to abate the carbon footprint. A cut-off policy is proposed to deter the low-type retailer from signing contracts. More carbon-reducing investment is made when the high-type retailer signs contracts. Carbon-reducing contracts can ensure profitability and environmental responsibility. Abstract: Corporate environmental responsibility has received considerable attention, but how information asymmetry affects firms' incentives in their fulfillment of environmental responsibilities and achievement of profitability has not yet been fully understood. In this paper, we consider a supply chain in which a manufacturer and a retailer invest in carbon-reducing technology and green-marketing efforts, respectively, to reduce carbon footprint. The main issue addressed here is how does the manufacturer design contracts to ensure profitability and compliance with environmental responsibilities when the retailer privately knows the extent of green-marketing efforts and the true market size. We develop contracting models for the decentralized supply chain and for the benchmark case in which the supply chain is vertically integrated. The results show that, in equilibrium, the optimal contract under full information ensures profitability and compliance with environmental responsibilities in that the system profit and the carbon footprint in theHighlights: We study the design of carbon-reducing contracts under asymmetric information. A menu of contracts is offered to induce the retailer to abate the carbon footprint. A cut-off policy is proposed to deter the low-type retailer from signing contracts. More carbon-reducing investment is made when the high-type retailer signs contracts. Carbon-reducing contracts can ensure profitability and environmental responsibility. Abstract: Corporate environmental responsibility has received considerable attention, but how information asymmetry affects firms' incentives in their fulfillment of environmental responsibilities and achievement of profitability has not yet been fully understood. In this paper, we consider a supply chain in which a manufacturer and a retailer invest in carbon-reducing technology and green-marketing efforts, respectively, to reduce carbon footprint. The main issue addressed here is how does the manufacturer design contracts to ensure profitability and compliance with environmental responsibilities when the retailer privately knows the extent of green-marketing efforts and the true market size. We develop contracting models for the decentralized supply chain and for the benchmark case in which the supply chain is vertically integrated. The results show that, in equilibrium, the optimal contract under full information ensures profitability and compliance with environmental responsibilities in that the system profit and the carbon footprint in the decentralized supply chain equal those in the integrated supply chain. Under asymmetric information, the manufacturer offers a menu of contracts to induce the retailer to disclose the true market size and to actively engage in carbon footprint reduction. In particular, the menu of contracts allows the manufacturer to obtain more profit with a lower carbon footprint, and enables the retailer to get extra information rent and therefore facilitates the fulfillment of environmental responsibility. Interestingly, the manufacturer may employ a cut-off policy to deter the retailer from contracting under some conditions. We reveal that the policy is always profitable for the manufacturer, whereas it may not be environmentally friendly. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis demonstrates that: (i) when the efficiency of carbon-reducing investment increases, the menu of contracts makes the manufacturer more profitable and results in a reduced carbon footprint as long as the efficiency becomes sufficiently high, and (ii) when the probability of a high market size increases or the carbon trading price rises, the menu of contracts increases the manufacturer's profit and meanwhile decreases the carbon footprint, thus ensuring profitability and compliance with environmental responsibilities. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Omega. Volume 102(2021)
- Journal:
- Omega
- Issue:
- Volume 102(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0102-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-07
- Subjects:
- Green supply chain -- Carbon-reducing contract -- Environmental responsibility -- Information asymmetry
Management -- Periodicals
658.4005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/latest/03050483 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102390 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0305-0483
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6256.426000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26012.xml