The Use of Active Comparators in Self-Controlled Designs. Issue 10 (16th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hallas, Jesper; Whitaker, Heather; Delaney, Joseph A; Cadarette, Suzanne M; Pratt, Nicole; Maclure, Malcolm
• Is Part Of: American journal of epidemiology. Volume 190:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: 2181
• Page End: 2187
• Publication Date: 2021-04-16
• Subjects: active comparators -- case-only designs -- confounding-by-indication; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab110
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-9262

Abstract

Abstract: For self-controlled studies of medication-related effects, time-varying confounding by indication can occur if the indication varies over time. We describe how active comparators might mitigate such bias, using an empirical example. Approaches to using active comparators are described for case-crossover design, case-time-control design, self-controlled case-series, and sequence symmetry analyses. In the empirical example, we used Danish data from 1996–2018 to study the association between penicillin and venous thromboembolism (VTE), using roxithromycin, a macrolide antibiotic, as comparator. Upper respiratory infection is a transient risk factor for VTE, thus representing time-dependent confounding by indication. Odds ratios for case-crossover analysis were 3.35 (95% confidence interval: 3.23, 3.49) for penicillin and 3.56 (95% confidence interval: 3.30, 3.83) for roxithromycin. We used a Wald-based method or an interaction term to estimate the odds ratio for penicillin with roxithromycin as comparator. These 2 estimates were 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.87, 1.03) and 1.03 (95% confidence interval: 0.95, 1.13). Results were similar for the case-time-control analysis, but both the self-controlled case-series and sequence symmetry analysis suggested a weak protective effect of penicillin, seemingly explained by VTE affecting future exposure exclusively for penicillin. The strong association of antibiotics with VTE suggests presence of confounding by indication. Such confounding can be mitigated by using an active comparator.