The importance of surgical resection in the management of rectal sarcoma: A national cancer database analysis of 133 cases. Issue 3 (March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Freund, Michael R.; Emile, Sameh Hany; Horesh, Nir; Garoufalia, Zoe; Gefen, Rachel; Wexner, Steven D.
• Is Part Of: European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 49:Issue 3(2023)
• Page Start: 647
• Page End: 654
• Publication Date: 2023-03
• Subjects: Rectal sarcoma -- National cancer database -- NCDB -- Surgical resection -- Overall survival; Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Medical Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Oncologie; Chirurgie (geneeskunde); Electronic journals; Electronic journals -- Sciences; Electronic journals -- Medicine; Electronic journals; 616.994059005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0748-7983

Abstract

Abstract: Background and purpose: Rectal sarcomas (RS) are rare malignant tumors with a very poor prognosis. This study aimed to assess the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of RS in the United States. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019 of patients with a diagnosis of RS. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and its predictors. Results: 133 RS patients (39.1% female) with a mean age of 65.7 ± 15.6 years were included in the study. Mean tumor size was 6.1 ± 3 cm. The crude OS rate was 22.5% and median survival duration was 10.1 (IQR: 3.2–21) months. Factors associated with an improved OS on were private insurance (HR = 0.23, p = 0.001) and undergoing surgery (HR 0.23, p < 0.001), Factors associated with poor survival were age (HR 1.02, p = 0.005), male sex (HR 2.27, p = 0.001), Charlson score of 3 (HR 5.17, p = 0.003), and positive resection margins (HR: 2.64, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that male sex (HR 2.16, p = 0.04) and positive resection margins (HR 2.31, p = 0.03) were predictors of poor survival whereas surgery was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.321, p < 0.001) Conclusions: RS is a very rare rectal malignancy with an even poorer prognosis than previously reported. However, undergoing surgery with curative intent while obtaining negative margins may confer better OS.