Towards fully automated deep-learning-based brain tumor segmentation: Is brain extraction still necessary?. (April 2023)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Towards fully automated deep-learning-based brain tumor segmentation: Is brain extraction still necessary?. (April 2023)
- Main Title:
- Towards fully automated deep-learning-based brain tumor segmentation: Is brain extraction still necessary?
- Authors:
- Pacheco, Bruno Machado
Cassia, Guilherme de Souza e
Silva, Danilo - Abstract:
- Abstract: State-of-the-art brain tumor segmentation is based on deep learning models applied to multi-modal MRIs. Currently, these models are trained on images after a preprocessing stage that involves registration, interpolation, brain extraction (BE, also known as skull-stripping) and manual correction by an expert. However, for clinical practice, this last step is tedious and time-consuming and, therefore, not always feasible, resulting in skull-stripping faults that can negatively impact the tumor segmentation quality. Still, the extent of this impact has never been measured for any of the many different BE methods available. In this work, we propose an automatic brain tumor segmentation pipeline and evaluate its performance with multiple BE methods. Our experiments show that the choice of a BE method can compromise up to 15.7% of the tumor segmentation performance. Moreover, we propose training and testing tumor segmentation models on non-skull-stripped images, effectively discarding the BE step from the pipeline. Our results show that this approach leads to a competitive performance at a fraction of the time. We conclude that, in contrast to the current paradigm, training tumor segmentation models on non-skull-stripped images can be the best option when high performance in clinical practice is desired. Highlights: State-of-the-art brain tumor segmentation models require expert brain segmentation. Automatic brain extraction can compromise 15.7% of the tumor segmentationAbstract: State-of-the-art brain tumor segmentation is based on deep learning models applied to multi-modal MRIs. Currently, these models are trained on images after a preprocessing stage that involves registration, interpolation, brain extraction (BE, also known as skull-stripping) and manual correction by an expert. However, for clinical practice, this last step is tedious and time-consuming and, therefore, not always feasible, resulting in skull-stripping faults that can negatively impact the tumor segmentation quality. Still, the extent of this impact has never been measured for any of the many different BE methods available. In this work, we propose an automatic brain tumor segmentation pipeline and evaluate its performance with multiple BE methods. Our experiments show that the choice of a BE method can compromise up to 15.7% of the tumor segmentation performance. Moreover, we propose training and testing tumor segmentation models on non-skull-stripped images, effectively discarding the BE step from the pipeline. Our results show that this approach leads to a competitive performance at a fraction of the time. We conclude that, in contrast to the current paradigm, training tumor segmentation models on non-skull-stripped images can be the best option when high performance in clinical practice is desired. Highlights: State-of-the-art brain tumor segmentation models require expert brain segmentation. Automatic brain extraction can compromise 15.7% of the tumor segmentation performance. Single-stage tumor segmentation on raw images may outperform state-of-the-art models. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Biomedical signal processing and control. Volume 82(2023)
- Journal:
- Biomedical signal processing and control
- Issue:
- Volume 82(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 82, Issue 2023 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 82
- Issue:
- 2023
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0082-2023-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2023-04
- Subjects:
- Brain extraction -- Skull-stripping -- Brain tumor segmentation -- Deep learning -- Evaluation -- TCGA
Signal processing -- Periodicals
Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted -- Periodicals
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted -- Periodicals
Biomedical Engineering -- Periodicals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17468094 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%2329675%232006%23999989998%23626449%23FLA%23&_cdi=29675&_pubType=J&_auth=y&_acct=C000045259&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=836873&md5=664b5cf9a57fc91971a17faf20c32ec1 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104514 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1746-8094
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2087.880400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26009.xml