Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the omicron period: a cross-sectional study. (March 2023)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the omicron period: a cross-sectional study. (March 2023)
- Main Title:
- Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the omicron period: a cross-sectional study
- Authors:
- Venekamp, Roderick P.
Schuit, Ewoud
Hooft, Lotty
Veldhuijzen, Irene K.
van den Bijllaardt, Wouter
Pas, Suzan D.
Zwart, Vivian F.
Lodder, Esther B.
Hellwich, Marloes
Koppelman, Marco
Molenkamp, Richard
Wijers, Constantijn J.H.
Vroom, Irene H.
Smeets, Leonard C.
Nagel-Imming, Carla R.S.
Han, Wanda G.H.
van den Hof, Susan
Kluytmans, Jan A.J.W.
van de Wijgert, Janneke H.H.M.
Moons, Karel G.M. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: To assess the performances of three commonly used antigen rapid diagnostic tests used as self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the Omicron period. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study in the Omicron period in three public health service COVID-19 test sites in the Netherlands, including 3600 asymptomatic individuals aged ≥ 16 years presenting for SARS-CoV-2 testing for any reason except confirmatory testing after a positive self-test. Participants were sampled for RT-PCR (reference test) and received one self-test (either Acon Flowflex [Flowflex], MP Biomedicals (MPBio), or Siemens-Healthineers CLINITEST [CLINITEST]) to perform unsupervised at home. Diagnostic accuracies of each self-test were calculated. Results: Overall sensitivities were 27.5% (95% CI, 21.3–34.3%) for Flowflex, 20.9% (13.9–29.4%) for MPBio, and 25.6% (19.1–33.1%) for CLINITEST. After applying a viral load cut-off (≥5.2 log10 SARS-CoV-2 E-gene copies/mL), sensitivities increased to 48.3% (37.6–59.2%), 37.8% (22.5–55.2%), and 40.0% (29.5–51.2%), respectively. Specificities were >99% for all tests in most analyses. Discussion: The sensitivities of three commonly used SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests when used as self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the Omicron period were very low. Antigen rapid diagnostic test self-testing in asymptomatic individuals may only detect a minority of infections at that point in time. Repeated self-testingAbstract: Objectives: To assess the performances of three commonly used antigen rapid diagnostic tests used as self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the Omicron period. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study in the Omicron period in three public health service COVID-19 test sites in the Netherlands, including 3600 asymptomatic individuals aged ≥ 16 years presenting for SARS-CoV-2 testing for any reason except confirmatory testing after a positive self-test. Participants were sampled for RT-PCR (reference test) and received one self-test (either Acon Flowflex [Flowflex], MP Biomedicals (MPBio), or Siemens-Healthineers CLINITEST [CLINITEST]) to perform unsupervised at home. Diagnostic accuracies of each self-test were calculated. Results: Overall sensitivities were 27.5% (95% CI, 21.3–34.3%) for Flowflex, 20.9% (13.9–29.4%) for MPBio, and 25.6% (19.1–33.1%) for CLINITEST. After applying a viral load cut-off (≥5.2 log10 SARS-CoV-2 E-gene copies/mL), sensitivities increased to 48.3% (37.6–59.2%), 37.8% (22.5–55.2%), and 40.0% (29.5–51.2%), respectively. Specificities were >99% for all tests in most analyses. Discussion: The sensitivities of three commonly used SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests when used as self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the Omicron period were very low. Antigen rapid diagnostic test self-testing in asymptomatic individuals may only detect a minority of infections at that point in time. Repeated self-testing in case of a negative self-test is advocated to improve the diagnostic yield, and individuals should be advised to re-test when symptoms develop. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical microbiology and infection. Volume 29:Number 3(2023)
- Journal:
- Clinical microbiology and infection
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Number 3(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 3 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0029-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 391.e1
- Page End:
- 391.e7
- Publication Date:
- 2023-03
- Subjects:
- Asymptomatic individuals -- Diagnostic accuracy -- Rapid antigen tests -- SARS-CoV-2
Medical microbiology -- Periodicals
Diagnostic microbiology -- Periodicals
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
616.01 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-0691 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.11.004 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1198-743X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.305520
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26001.xml