Comparing "apples" and "oranges" in the Woodford Shale: Pitfalls of the thermal maturity gradient approach for constraining evolution of mudrock porosity. (April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baruch, Elizabeth T.; Löhr, Stefan C.; Han, Shujun; Dewhurst, David N.; Collins, Alan S.
• Is Part Of: Marine and petroleum geology. Volume 150(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-04
• Subjects: Pore system -- Thermal maturity -- Heterogeneity -- Mineralogy -- Organic matter -- Microtexture -- Shale -- SEM; Submarine geology -- Periodicals; Petroleum -- Geology -- Periodicals; Géologie sous-marine -- Périodiques; Pétrole -- Géologie -- Périodiques; Petroleum -- Geology; Submarine geology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 551.468
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2023.106161
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-8172

Abstract

Abstract: The thermal maturity gradient approach is widely used in comparative studies of mudrocks to assess the evolution of the pore system. The fundamental assumption in this approach is that the compared samples share similar geochemical, mineralogical and textural properties, so that any differences between them can be reasonably attributed to the impact of thermal maturity and burial alteration. However, achieving the desired range of thermal maturity often requires sampling from widely spaced localities which may result in unrecognised microtextural differences owing to regional variations in depositional controls, making it challenging to isolate the effects of thermal alteration on pore system evolution. We use samples from the widely studied siliceous Woodford Shale to highlight the importance of sample screening in characterization studies of pore evolution with progressive thermal maturity. Samples were collected from different cores spanning a gradient of thermal maturity (0.5–1.65 %VRc) across the Cherokee Platform, Arkoma and Anadarko basins, and capturing the wider geographic extent of the formation across Oklahoma. Samples were selected from the same lithofacies type but varying stratigraphic position and screened using the standard bulk geochemical and mineralogical criteria that are widely employed to ensure properties are comparable across a sample set. Notwithstanding this screening step, microscale electron microscope characterization revealed substantial microtextural and compositional differences within the sample set. Our results show that total pore volume is significantly influenced by these seemingly subtle differences, likely because pore evolution pathways vary with the abundance and distribution of primary (i.e. biogenic vs detrital grains) and diagenetic sediment constituents. We conclude that standard sample screening approaches that are limited to bulk mineralogical and geochemical characterization, and cannot identify differences in detrital, biogenic and authigenic components or account for textural differences, are insufficient for thermal gradient studies. A combination of high-resolution imaging, mineral mapping, x-ray diffraction, and low-pressure gas adsorption experiments proved better suited for sample screening ensuring an "apples" to "apples" comparison, as well as for detailed characterization bringing to light the impact of microtextural heterogeneity between samples on measured rock properties. Highlights: Sample selection based on thermal maturity and bulk sample analyses alone are poor predictors of microtextural differences controlling pore system evolution. Alteration of the mineral matrix plays a critical role in the evolution of the pore system in this dataset. Microtextural differences affect the pathway of pore system evolution and needs consideration during sample screening. A new generation of automated SEM and mineral mapping facilitated identification of like-to-like samples.