Efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone, a new Thiazolidinedione, as compared to the standard of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 1 (January 2023)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone, a new Thiazolidinedione, as compared to the standard of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 1 (January 2023)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone, a new Thiazolidinedione, as compared to the standard of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Joshi, Shashank R.
Das, Saibal
Xaviar, Suja
Samajdar, Shambo Samrat
Saha, Indranil
Sarkar, Sougata
Mukherjee, Shatavisa
Tripathi, Santanu Kumar
Pal, Jyotirmoy
Chatterjee, Nandini - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone as compared to the standard of care (SOC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the comparison of the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level after 24 weeks. Pooled mean differences and odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models. Results: Of 267 studies that were screened, four were included. Treatment with adjunct lobeglitazone showed a reduction in the HbA1C level [mean difference: −0.23% (95% CI: −0.62 to 0.16); p = 0.24; i 2 : 87%; moderate GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and. Evaluation) of evidence], fasting blood glucose level [mean difference: −7.12 mg/dl (95% CI: −20.09 to 5.85); p = 0.28; i 2 : 87%; moderate GRADE of evidence], and lipid profile as compared to those following treatment with the SOC; however, the changes were not statistically significant. The risk of hypoglycemia was significantly lower [odds ratio: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.70); p < 0.05; i 2 : 0%; moderate GRADE of evidence] without any significant difference in the risk of drug-related adverse events [odds ratio: 1.59 (95% CI: 0.87 to 2.93); p = 0.13; i 2 : 0%; moderate GRADE of evidence] following treatment with lobeglitazone as compared to those following treatment with the SOC. Conclusion: Treatment with adjunct lobeglitazoneAbstract: Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone as compared to the standard of care (SOC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the comparison of the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level after 24 weeks. Pooled mean differences and odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models. Results: Of 267 studies that were screened, four were included. Treatment with adjunct lobeglitazone showed a reduction in the HbA1C level [mean difference: −0.23% (95% CI: −0.62 to 0.16); p = 0.24; i 2 : 87%; moderate GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and. Evaluation) of evidence], fasting blood glucose level [mean difference: −7.12 mg/dl (95% CI: −20.09 to 5.85); p = 0.28; i 2 : 87%; moderate GRADE of evidence], and lipid profile as compared to those following treatment with the SOC; however, the changes were not statistically significant. The risk of hypoglycemia was significantly lower [odds ratio: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.70); p < 0.05; i 2 : 0%; moderate GRADE of evidence] without any significant difference in the risk of drug-related adverse events [odds ratio: 1.59 (95% CI: 0.87 to 2.93); p = 0.13; i 2 : 0%; moderate GRADE of evidence] following treatment with lobeglitazone as compared to those following treatment with the SOC. Conclusion: Treatment with adjunct lobeglitazone showed changes in the blood glycemic status and lipid profile similar to SOC in patients with T2DM, and the results were not statistically significant. Lobeglitazone was well tolerated; its safety profile was comparable to SOC. Highlights: Adjunct lobeglitazone showed improvements in the blood glycemic status and lipid profile. The results were; however, not statistically significant. The safety profile of lobeglitazone was good in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. Volume 17:Issue 1(2023)
- Journal:
- Diabetes & metabolic syndrome
- Issue:
- Volume 17:Issue 1(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 17, Issue 1 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 17
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0017-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2023-01
- Subjects:
- Blood glucose -- Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) -- Lipid profile -- Lobeglitazone -- Thiazolidinedione
Diabetes -- Periodicals
Metabolism -- Disorders -- Periodicals
Diabetes Mellitus -- Periodicals
Metabolic Diseases -- Periodicals
Diabète -- Périodiques
Métabolisme, Troubles du -- Périodiques
Endocrinologie -- Périodiques
Diabète -- Physiopathologie -- Périodiques
Diabetes
Metabolism -- Disorders
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.462 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/18714021 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/18714021 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/18714021 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102703 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1871-4021
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3579.600509
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25972.xml