Effect of Levodopa and Environmental Setting on Gait and Turning Digital Markers Related to Falls in People with Parkinson's Disease. Issue 2 (4th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shah, Vrutangkumar V.; McNames, James; Carlson‐Kuhta, Patricia; Nutt, John G.; El‐Gohary, Mahmoud; Sowalsky, Kristen; Mancini, Martina; Horak, Fay B.
• Is Part Of: Movement disorders clinical practice. Volume 10:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 223
• Page End: 230
• Publication Date: 2022-11-04
• Subjects: mobility -- levodopa -- Parkinson's disease -- daily life -- clinic; Movement Disorders; Movement disorders -- Periodicals; Movement disorders; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13601
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2330-1619

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: It is unknown whether medication status ( off and on levodopa) or laboratory versus home settings plays a role in discriminating fallers and non‐fallers in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Objectives: To investigate which specific digital gait and turning measures, obtained with body‐worn sensors, best discriminated fallers from non‐fallers with PD in the clinic and during daily life. Methods: We recruited 34 subjects with PD (17 fallers and 17 non‐fallers based on the past 6 month's falls). Subjects wore three inertial sensors attached to both feet and the lumbar region in the laboratory for a 3‐minute walking task (both off and on levodopa) and during daily life activities for a week. We derived 24 digital (18 gait and 6 turn) measures from the 3‐minute walk and from daily life. Results: In clinic, none of the gait and turning measures collected during on levodopa state were significantly different between fallers and non‐fallers. In contrast, digital measures collected in the off levodopa state were significantly different between groups, (average turn velocity, average number of steps to complete a turn, and variability of gait speed, P < 0.03). During daily life, the variability of average turn velocity ( P = 0.023) was significantly different in fallers than non‐fallers. Last, the average number of steps to complete a turn was significantly correlated with the patient‐reported outcomes. Conclusions: Digital measures of turning, but not gait, were different in fallers compared to non‐fallers with PD, in the laboratory when off medication and during a daily life.