Optimal ventilator strategies for trauma-related ARDS. Issue 3 (29th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Goatly, Giles; Guidozzi, N; Khan, M
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. Volume 165:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 193
• Page End: 197
• Publication Date: 2018-03-29
• Subjects: respiratory physiology -- trauma management -- acute respiratory distress syndrome
• DOI: 10.1136/jramc-2017-000889
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0035-8665

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was first described in the 1960s and has become a major area of research due to the mortality and morbidity associated with it. ARDS is currently defined using the Berlin Consensus; however, this is not wholly applicable for trauma-related ARDS. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses methodology. The Ovid Medline, Web of Science and PubMed online databases were interrogated for papers published between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2017. Results: The literature search yielded a total of 64 papers that fulfilled the search criteria. Conclusions: Despite decades of dedicated research into different treatment modalities, ARDS continues to carry a high burden of mortality. The ARDS definitions laid out in the Berlin consensus are not entirely suited to trauma. While trauma-related ARDS represents a small portion of the available research, the evidence continues to favour low tidal volume ventilation as the benchmark for current practice. Positive end expiratory ventilation and airway pressure release ventilation in trauma cohorts may be beneficial; however, the evidence to date does not show this.