Assessing the impact of privacy-preserving record linkage on record overlap and patient demographic and clinical characteristics in PCORnet®, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. (30th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marsolo, Keith; Kiernan, Daniel; Toh, Sengwee; Phua, Jasmin; Louzao, Darcy; Haynes, Kevin; Weiner, Mark; Angulo, Francisco; Bailey, Charles; Bian, Jiang; Fort, Daniel; Grannis, Shaun; Krishnamurthy, Ashok Kumar; Nair, Vinit; Rivera, Pedro; Silverstein, Jonathan; Zirkle, Maryan; Carton, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 30:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: 447
• Page End: 455
• Publication Date: 2022-11-30
• Subjects: privacy-preserving record linkage -- distributed research networks -- real-world data; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Information Services -- Periodicals; Medical Informatics -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Informatica; Geneeskunde; Informatique médicale; Computer network resources; Electronic journals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac229
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-5027

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: This article describes the implementation of a privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) solution across PCORnet ®, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. Material and Methods: Using a PPRL solution from Datavant, we quantified the degree of patient overlap across the network and report a de-duplicated analysis of the demographic and clinical characteristics of the PCORnet population. Results: There were ∼170M patient records across the responding Network Partners, with ∼138M (81%) of those corresponding to a unique patient. 82.1% of patients were found in a single partner and 14.7% were in 2. The percentage overlap between Partners ranged between 0% and 80% with a median of 0%. Linking patients' electronic health records with claims increased disease prevalence in every clinical characteristic, ranging between 63% and 173%. Discussion: The overlap between Partners was variable and depended on timeframe. However, patient data linkage changed the prevalence profile of the PCORnet patient population. Conclusions: This project was one of the largest linkage efforts of its kind and demonstrates the potential value of record linkage. Linkage between Partners may be most useful in cases where there is geographic proximity between Partners, an expectation that potential linkage Partners will be able to fill gaps in data, or a longer study timeframe.