An Investigation of Body Size Impact on Organ Doses for Neutron External Exposures Using the MRCP-based Phantom Library. Issue 4 (25th April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Han, Haegin; Choi, Ji Won; Lee, Yumi; Lee, Soo Min; Kim, Chan Hyeong; Choi, Hyun Joon; Yeom, Yeon Soo
• Is Part Of: Health physics. Volume 124:Issue 4(2023)
• Page Start: 316
• Page End: 325
• Publication Date: 2023-04-25
• Subjects: dose, external -- dose, organ -- Monte Carlo -- phantom, mathematical; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Health Physics -- periodicals; Radiation Protection -- periodicals; Radiotherapy -- periodicals; Medische fysica; Electronic journals; 612.01448
• DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001672
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-9078

Abstract

Abstract: In a recent study, a comprehensive library composed of 212 phantoms with different body sizes was established by deforming the adult male and female mesh-type reference computational phantoms (MRCPs) of ICRP Publication 145 and the next-generation ICRP reference phantoms over the current voxel-type reference phantoms of ICRP Publication 110. In this study, as an application of the MRCP-based phantom library, we investigated dosimetric impacts due to the different body sizes for neutron external exposures. A comprehensive dataset of organ/tissue dose coefficients (DCs) for idealized external neutron beams with four phantoms for each sex representatively selected from the phantom library were produced by performing Monte Carlo simulations using the Geant4 code. The body size-dependent DCs produced in this study were systematically analyzed, observing that the variation of the body weights overall played a more important role in organ/tissue dose calculations than the variation of the body heights. We also observed that the reference body-size DCs based on the MRCPs indeed significantly under- or overestimated the DCs produced using the phantoms, especially for those much heavier (male: 175 cm and 140 kg; female: 165 cm and 140 kg) than the reference body sizes (male: 176 cm and 73 kg; female: 163 cm and 60 kg) by up to 1.6 or 3.3 times, respectively. We believe that the use of the body size-dependent DCs, together with the reference body-size DCs, should be beneficial for more reliable organ/tissue dose estimates of individuals considering their body sizes rather than the most common conventional approach, i.e., the sole use of the reference body size DCs.