Association Between Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Use and Memory Decline: Findings From the Health and Retirement Study. (7th February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lu, Peiyi; Kezios, Katrina; Lee, Jongseong; Calonico, Sebastian; Wimer, Christopher; Zeki Al Hazzouri, Adina
• Is Part Of: Neurology. Volume 100:Number 6(2023)
• Page Start: e595
• Page End: e602
• Publication Date: 2023-02-07
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurologie -- Périodiques; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201499
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3878

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Objectives: Studies on the effect of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on the cognitive health of older adults are scarce. We sought to examine the associations between SNAP use and memory decline among SNAP-eligible US older adults. Methods: Participants aged 50+ years and SNAP-eligible in 1996 from the Health and Retirement Study were included. Participants' SNAP eligibility was constructed using federal criteria. Participants also self-reported whether they used SNAP. Memory function was assessed biennially from 1996 through 2016 using a composite score. To account for preexisting differences in characteristics between SNAP users and nonusers, we modeled the probability of SNAP use using demographic and health covariates. Using linear mixed-effects models, we then modeled trajectories of memory function for SNAP users and nonusers using inverse probability (IP) weighting and propensity score (PS) matching techniques. In all models, we accounted for study attrition. Results: Of the 3, 555 SNAP-eligible participants, a total of 15.7% were SNAP users. At baseline, SNAP users had lower socioeconomic status and a greater number of chronic conditions than nonusers and were more likely to be lost to follow-up. Our multivariable IP-weighted models suggested that SNAP users had worse memory scores at baseline but slower rates of memory decline compared with nonusers (the annual decline rate is −0.038 standardized units [95% CI = −0.044 to −0.032] for users and −0.046 [95% CI = −0.049 to −0.043] for nonusers). Results were slightly stronger from the PS-matched sample (N = 1, 014) (the annual decline rate was −0.046 units [95% CI = −0.050 to −0.042] for users and −0.060 units [95% CI = −0.064 to −0.056] for nonusers). Put in other words, our findings suggested that SNAP users had approximately 2 fewer years of cognitive aging over a 10-year period compared with nonusers. Discussion: After accounting for preexisting differences between eligible SNAP users and nonusers as well as differential attrition, we find SNAP use to be associated with slower memory function decline.