Development of a Novel Device for Decompressive Craniectomy: An Experimental and Cadaveric Study and Preliminary Clinical Application. Issue 3 (12th March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Berra, Luigi Valentino; Cedrone, Guido; Di Norcia, Valerio; D'Angelo, Luca; Brunetto, Floriana; Familiari, Pietro; Palmieri, Mauro; Capobianco, Mattia; Pappone, Federica; Santoro, Antonio
• Is Part Of: Operative neurosurgery. Volume 24:Issue 3(2023)
• Page Start: 324
• Page End: 330
• Publication Date: 2023-03-12
• Subjects: Decompressive craniectomy -- Augmentative craniotomy -- Intracranial hypertension -- Hinge craniotomy -- Cerebral edema -- Cranial fixation -- Craniectomy -- Cranioplasty -- Brain swelling -- Surgical technique; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.480590
• DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000530
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2332-4252

Abstract

Abstract : BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy is an intervention of established efficacy in patients with intractable cerebral edema. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new device used in alternative to decompressive craniectomy. This device is designed to perform an augmentative craniotomy by keeping the bone flap elevated using specific cranial suspension titanium plates and giving the brain enough room to swell. METHODS: We tested the mechanical characteristics of the cranial brackets on dried skulls, on 3D-printed skull models, and on a preserved cadaver head. The resistance of the device was examined through dynamometric testing, and the feasibility of the surgical technique, including the suspension of the bone flap and the skin closure, was investigated on the cadaveric model. A preliminary clinical series of 2 patients is also reported. RESULTS: The laboratory tests have shown that this system allows an adequate expansion of the intracranial volume and it could withstand a force up to 637 ± 13 N in the synthetic model and up to 658 ± 9 N in the human skull without dislocation or failure of the brackets nor fractures of the bone ridges. Preliminary application in the clinical setting has shown that augmentative craniotomy is effective in the control of intracranial hypertension and could reduce the costs and complications associated with the classical decompressive craniectomy technique. CONCLUSION: Preliminary laboratory and clinical results show augmentative craniotomy to be a promising, alternative technique to decompressive craniectomy. Further clinical studies will be needed to validate its efficacy.