A systematic review of perioperative clinical practice guidelines for care of older adults living with frailty. (March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Engel, Jake S.; Tran, Jason; Khalil, Noha; Hladkowicz, Emily; Lalu, Manoj M.; Huang, Allen; Wong, Camilla L.; Hutton, Brian; Dhesi, Jugdeep K.; McIsaac, Daniel I.
• Is Part Of: British journal of anaesthesia. Volume 130:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: 262
• Page End: 271
• Publication Date: 2023-03
• Subjects: comprehensive geriatric assessment -- CPGs -- frail -- guidelines -- surgery -- surgical; Anesthesiology -- Periodicals; Anesthesia -- Periodicals; 617.9605
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-0912

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Perioperative frailty is prevalent and requires complex management, which could be guided by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). The objective of this systematic review was to identify and synthesise CPGs that provide perioperative recommendations specific to older adults living with frailty. Methods: After protocol registration, we performed a systematic review of CPGs. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and 14 grey literature databases were searched (January 1, 2000 until December 22, 2021). We included all CPGs that contained at least one frailty-specific recommendation related to any phase of the perioperative period. We compiled all relevant recommendations, extracted underlying strength of evidence, and categorised them by perioperative phase of care. Within each phase, recommendations were synthesised inductively into themes. Quality of CPGs was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Results: From 4707 citations, 13 guidelines were included; 8/13 were focused on the perioperative care of older surgical patients in general. Among 110 recommendations extracted, 37 themes were generated, with the majority pertaining to preoperative care. Four themes were supported by strong evidence: performing preoperative frailty assessments, using multidimensional frailty instruments, reducing urinary catheter use, and following multidisciplinary care and communication throughout the perioperative period. Per AGREE II, most guidelines (8/13; 62%) were recommended for use with modifications. Conclusions: Despite increasing numbers of patients living with frailty, few guidelines exist that address frailty-specific perioperative care. Given the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations, particularly outside the preoperative period, high-quality primary research is required to underpin future guidelines and better inform the care of older surgical patients with frailty. Systematic review protocol: PROSPERO CRD42022320149.