Impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on statistical design and analysis plans for multidomain intervention clinical trials: Experience from World‐Wide FINGERS. Issue 1 (11th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Röhr, Susanne; Arai, Hidenori; Mangialasche, Francesca; Matsumoto, Nanae; Peltonen, Markku; Raman, Rema; Riedel‐Heller, Steffi G.; Sakurai, Takashi; Snyder, Heather M.; Sugimoto, Taiki; Carrillo, Maria; Kivipelto, Miia; Espeland, Mark A.
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 7:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-03-11
• Subjects: cognitive function -- COVID‐19 pandemic design -- lifestyle interventions -- randomized controlled clinical trials; Dementia -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Alzheimer's disease -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; 616.831
• DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12143
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-8737

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) pandemic presents challenges to the conduct of randomized clinical trials of lifestyle interventions. Methods: World‐Wide FINGERS is an international network of clinical trials to assess the impact of multidomain lifestyle intervention on cognitive decline in at‐risk adults. Individual trials are tailoring successful approaches from the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) to local cultures and environments. The network convened a forum for researchers to discuss statistical design and analysis issues they faced during the pandemic. We report on experiences of three trials that, at various stages of conduct, altered designs and analysis plans to navigate these issues. We provide recommendations for future trials to consider as they develop and launch behavioral intervention trials. Results: The pandemic led researchers to change recruitment plans, interrupt timelines for assessments and intervention delivery, and move to remote intervention and assessment protocols. The necessity of these changes add emphasis to the importance, in study design and analysis, of intention to treat approaches, flexibility, within‐site stratification, interim power projections, and sensitivity analyses. Discussion: Robust approaches to study design and analysis are critical to negotiate issues related to the intervention. The world‐wide network of similarly oriented clinical trials will allow us to evaluate the effectiveness of responses to the pandemic across cultures, local environments, and phases of the pandemic.