Heppa III Intercomparison Experiment on Electron Precipitation Impacts: 2. Model‐Measurement Intercomparison of Nitric Oxide (NO) During a Geomagnetic Storm in April 2010. Issue 1 (30th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sinnhuber, M.; Nesse Tyssøy, H.; Asikainen, T.; Bender, S.; Funke, B.; Hendrickx, K.; Pettit, J. M.; Reddmann, T.; Rozanov, E.; Schmidt, H.; Smith‐Johnsen, C.; Sukhodolov, T.; Szeląg, M. E.; van de Kamp, M.; Verronen, P. T.; Wissing, J. M.; Yakovchuk, O. S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 127:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-12-30
• Subjects: energetic electron precipitation -- mesosphere -- lower thermosphere -- geomagnetic forcing -- energetic particle precipitation -- middle atmosphere; Magnetospheric physics -- Periodicals; Space environment -- Periodicals; Cosmic physics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Atmospheres -- Periodicals; Heliosphere (Astrophysics) -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 523.01
• DOI: 10.1029/2021JA029466
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9380

Abstract

Abstract: Precipitating auroral and radiation belt electrons are considered to play an important part in the natural forcing of the middle atmosphere with a possible impact on the climate system. Recent studies suggest that this forcing is underestimated in current chemistry‐climate models. The HEPPA III intercomparison experiment is a collective effort to address this point. In this study, we apply electron ionization rates from three data‐sets in four chemistry‐climate models during a geomagnetically active period in April 2010. Results are evaluated by comparison with observations of nitric oxide (NO) in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. Differences between the ionization rate data‐sets have been assessed in a companion study. In the lower thermosphere, NO densities differ by up to one order of magnitude between models using the same ionization rate data‐sets due to differences in the treatment of NO formation, model climatology, and model top height. However, a good agreement in the spatial and temporal variability of NO with observations lends confidence that the electron ionization is represented well above 80 km. In the mesosphere, the averages of model results from all chemistry‐climate models differ consistently with the differences in the ionization‐rate data‐sets, but are within the spread of the observations, so no clear assessment on their comparative validity can be provided. However, observed enhanced amounts of NO in the mid‐mesosphere below 70 km suggest a relevant contribution of the high‐energy tail of the electron distribution to the hemispheric NO budget during and after the geomagnetic storm on April 6. Key Points: Differences between multi‐model mean results at high latitudes are consistent with differences in the ionization rate data‐sets used Electron precipitation above 80 km is well reproduced for all ionization rate data‐sets despite large differences between individual CCMs Anisotropic precipitation from ≥300 keV electrons could provide up to 0.05–0.15 Gmol NO per hemisphere in storm main and recovery phase