No evidence for phylogenetic constraint on natural defense evolution among wild tomatoes. Issue 6 (1st June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Haak, David C.; Ballenger, Blake A.; Moyle, Leonie C.
• Is Part Of: Ecology. Volume 95:Issue 6(2014)
• Page Start: 1633
• Page End: 1641
• Publication Date: 2014-06-01
• Subjects: constitutive -- defense syndromes -- evolution -- inducibility -- macroevolution -- niche conservatism -- phylogeny -- Solanum -- trade-off; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Écologie -- Périodiques; Ecologie; Écologie; Écologie animale; Écologie végétale; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1890/13-1145.1
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-9658

Abstract

Abstract : Plant defense traits can be shaped by evolutionary and physiological constraints, as well as local ecological selection. We assessed the relative importance of these factors in shaping defense trait variation across the wild tomato clade (a group of 13 closely related species) using an herbivore bioassay ( Manduca sexta ). With phylogenetic comparative methods, we evaluated patterns of constitutive and induced defense variation, and the extent of coupling between alternative defense strategies. We detected substantial variation among species and found no evidence for phylogenetic conservatism among defensive traits, unlike for two other ecologically relevant (reproductive) traits. In addition, constitutive and induced defense syndromes were unassociated. These data indicate that, in this group, there is no evidence for either phylogenetic conservatism of shared consumer guilds that shape defense traits, or for constraints on defense trait evolution, including mechanistic trade‐offs between defense strategies. Our data suggest that defense trait variation in this clade instead results from rapid responses to local ecological conditions.