Multifaceted Public Health Response to a COVID-19 Outbreak Among Meat-Processing Workers, Utah, March-June 2020. Issue 1 (January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rogers, Tia M.; Robinson, Susan J.; Reynolds, Laura E.; Ladva, Chandresh N.; Burgos-Garay, Maria; Whiteman, Ari; Budge, Holly; Soto, Natalie; Thompson, Mariela; Hunt, Estee; Barson, Todd; Boyd, Andrew T.
• Is Part Of: Journal of public health management and practice. Volume 28:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01
• Subjects: attitudes -- COVID-19 -- coronavirus infections -- health behavior -- health disparities -- occupational health -- outbreak management -- risk communication -- survey; Public health administration -- United States -- Periodicals; 253.6
• DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001383
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1078-4659

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To identify potential strategies to mitigate COVID-19 transmission in a Utah meat-processing facility and surrounding community. Design/Setting: During March-June 2020, 502 workers at a Utah meat-processing facility (facility A) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Using merged data from the state disease surveillance system and facility A, we analyzed the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 positivity and worker demographics, work section, and geospatial data on worker residence. We analyzed worker survey responses to questions regarding COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors at work and home. Participants: (1) Facility A workers (n = 1373) with specimen collection dates and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test results; (2) residential addresses of all persons (workers and nonworkers) with a SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test (n = 1036), living within the 3 counties included in the health department catchment area; and (3) facility A workers (n = 64) who agreed to participate in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey. Main Outcome Measures: New cases over time, COVID-19 attack rates, worker characteristics by SARS-CoV-2 test results, geospatially clustered cases, space-time proximity of cases among workers and nonworkers; frequency of quantitative responses, crude prevalence ratios, and counts and frequency of coded responses to open-ended questions from the COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey. Results: Statistically significant differences in race ( P = .01), linguistic group ( P < .001), and work section ( P < .001) were found between workers with positive and negative SARS-CoV-2 test results. Geographically, only 6% of cases were within statistically significant spatiotemporal case clusters. Workers reported using handwashing (57%) and social distancing (21%) as mitigation strategies outside work but reported apprehension with taking COVID-19–associated sick leave. Conclusions: Mitigating COVID-19 outbreaks among workers in congregate settings requires a multifaceted public health response that is tailored to the workforce. Implications for Policy and Practice: Tailored, multifaceted mitigation strategies are crucial for reducing COVID-19–associated health disparities among disproportionately affected populations. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.