Application and Interpretation of an Interferon-Gamma Release Assay: Results of an Audit in a Canadian Centre. Issue 4 (2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vat, Sopharat; Ghannoum, Marc; Laflamme, Pierre; Dugas, Mario; Labrecque, Manon; Lavergne, Valéry
• Is Part Of: Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology =. Volume 23:Issue 4(2012)
• Page Start: 183
• Page End: 186
• Publication Date: 2012
• Subjects: Canadian guidelines -- Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) -- Internal audit -- Quality assurance -- Quantiferon TB Gold In-Tube -- Tuberculosis; Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Infection -- Periodicals; Communicable diseases; Infection; Communicable Diseases; Communicable Disease Control; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.1155/2012/838465
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1712-9532

Abstract

Abstract : BACKGROUND: Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are newly approved for diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). An internal audit was conducted to review the use of a newly implemented IGRA at the Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal (Montréal, Québec) to evaluate its concordance with Canadian recommendations and its implication on diagnosis. METHODS: From April 2007 to January 2009, all Quantiferon TB Gold In-Tube (QFT, Cellestis inc, USA) tests performed in at the Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal were retrieved. Strategies used to investigate LTBI and clinical interpretation of test results were compared with the local algorithm, which is derived from the current national guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients tested with QFT were included in the analysis. LTBI investigation and QFT testing were considered to be appropriate in 87.5% and 66.5% of patients, respectively. Overall, 67 QFT tests were performed inappropriately; 25 were performed when a LTBI investigation was not indicated and 42 were performed whe LTBI interpretation was possible with the result of the tuberculin skin test alone. Among the 175 patients investigated appropriately for LTBI, 49 QFT tests (28%) were interpreted incorrectly; 32 patients (at high risk of developing active tuberculosis) had a positive tuberculin skin test and a negative QFT result wrongly interpreted as being negative for LTBI and 13 patients should have undergone further LTBI investigations. CONCLUSION: Globally, the present study revealed that there are discrepancies on how the IGRA was employed and interpreted in a Montreal hospital and that strict compliance to the guidelines could significantly reduce errors in interpretation.