Peripheral Oxygen Saturation Facilitates Assessment of Respiratory Dysfunction in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score With Implications for the Sepsis-3 Criteria. Issue 3 (18th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Valik, John Karlsson; Mellhammar, Lisa; Sundén-Cullberg, Jonas; Ward, Logan; Unge, Christian; Dalianis, Hercules; Henriksson, Aron; Strålin, Kristoffer; Linder, Adam; Nauclér, Pontus
• Is Part Of: Critical care medicine. Volume 50:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: e272
• Page End: e283
• Publication Date: 2021-08-18
• Subjects: critical illness -- infections -- pulse oximetry -- respiratory failure -- sepsis -- Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; Soins intensifs -- Périodiques; 616.028
• DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005318
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0090-3493

Abstract

Abstract : OBJECTIVES: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score is the basis of the Sepsis-3 criteria and requires arterial blood gas analysis to assess respiratory function. Peripheral oxygen saturation is a noninvasive alternative but is not included in neither Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score nor Sepsis-3. We aimed to assess the association between worst peripheral oxygen saturation during onset of suspected infection and mortality. DESIGN: Cohort study of hospital admissions from a main cohort and emergency department visits from four external validation cohorts between year 2011 and 2018. Data were collected from electronic health records and prospectively by study investigators. SETTING: Eight academic and community hospitals in Sweden and Canada. PATIENTS: Adult patients with suspected infection episodes. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main cohort included 19, 396 episodes (median age, 67.0 [53.0–77.0]; 9, 007 [46.4%] women; 1, 044 [5.4%] died). The validation cohorts included 10, 586 episodes (range of median age, 61.0–76.0; women 42.1–50.2%; mortality 2.3–13.3%). Peripheral oxygen saturation levels 96–95% were not significantly associated with increased mortality in the main or pooled validation cohorts. At peripheral oxygen saturation 94%, the adjusted odds ratio of death was 1.56 (95% CI, 1.10–2.23) in the main cohort and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.00–1.85) in the pooled validation cohorts and increased gradually below this level. Respiratory assessment using peripheral oxygen saturation 94–91% and less than 91% to generate 1 and 2 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment points, respectively, improved the discrimination of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score from area under the receiver operating characteristics 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74–0.77) to 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77–0.80; p < 0.001). Peripheral oxygen saturation/Fio 2 ratio had slightly better predictive performance compared with peripheral oxygen saturation alone, but the clinical impact was minor. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence for assessing respiratory function with peripheral oxygen saturation in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and the Sepsis-3 criteria. Our data support using peripheral oxygen saturation thresholds 94% and 90% to get 1 and 2 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment respiratory points, respectively. This has important implications primarily for emergency practice, rapid response teams, surveillance, research, and resource-limited settings.