Comparative 12-month retention rate, effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel when used as a first add-on or a late add-on treatment in patients with focal epilepsies: The COM-PER study. (March 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative 12-month retention rate, effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel when used as a first add-on or a late add-on treatment in patients with focal epilepsies: The COM-PER study. (March 2021)
- Main Title:
- Comparative 12-month retention rate, effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel when used as a first add-on or a late add-on treatment in patients with focal epilepsies: The COM-PER study
- Authors:
- Canas, Nuno
Félix, Catarina
Silva, Vanessa
Arraiolos, Ana
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando - Abstract:
- Highlights: The retention rate of PER is higher when used as a first add-on than as a late add-on. The seizure freedom and responder rates are higher when PER is used as a first add-on than as a late add-on. PER is particularly effective in FBTCS, even as a late add-on. The tolerability of PER at 12 months is similar in both groups. Abstract: Objectives: To compare the 12-month retention rate, effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) as a first or late add-on treatment in adult patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS), including focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). Methods: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study was carried out in patients with FOS that received PER as a late add-on (n = 60), after failure of > 3 AEDs, and a group that received PER as a first add-on treatment (n = 21). Results: At 12 months, the retention (90.5 % vs. 48.3 %; p = 0.001), seizure-freedom (71.4 % vs. 13.3 %; p < 0.001) and responder (85.7 % vs. 28.3 %; p < 0.001) rates were significantly higher in the first add-on group compared with the late add-on group. In patients with FBTCS, the 12-month retention rate did not differ significantly between the first and late add-on groups (93.8 % vs. 66.7 %); however, seizure-freedom (81.2 % vs. 27.8 %; p = 0.002) and responder rate response (93.8 % vs. 44.4 %; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the first add-on group. There were no significant differences in tolerability between the two groups, including inHighlights: The retention rate of PER is higher when used as a first add-on than as a late add-on. The seizure freedom and responder rates are higher when PER is used as a first add-on than as a late add-on. PER is particularly effective in FBTCS, even as a late add-on. The tolerability of PER at 12 months is similar in both groups. Abstract: Objectives: To compare the 12-month retention rate, effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) as a first or late add-on treatment in adult patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS), including focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). Methods: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study was carried out in patients with FOS that received PER as a late add-on (n = 60), after failure of > 3 AEDs, and a group that received PER as a first add-on treatment (n = 21). Results: At 12 months, the retention (90.5 % vs. 48.3 %; p = 0.001), seizure-freedom (71.4 % vs. 13.3 %; p < 0.001) and responder (85.7 % vs. 28.3 %; p < 0.001) rates were significantly higher in the first add-on group compared with the late add-on group. In patients with FBTCS, the 12-month retention rate did not differ significantly between the first and late add-on groups (93.8 % vs. 66.7 %); however, seizure-freedom (81.2 % vs. 27.8 %; p = 0.002) and responder rate response (93.8 % vs. 44.4 %; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the first add-on group. There were no significant differences in tolerability between the two groups, including in patients with FBTCS. Adverse events were reported in 54.3 % of patients (44/81), most were mild or moderate, with dizziness being the most frequent one. Conclusion: Overall, retention rate and effectiveness at 12 months were significantly higher in patients taking PER as a first add-on than as a late add-on, and the tolerability of PER did not differ significantly between groups. PER demonstrated high effectiveness in patients with FBTCS, even as a late add-on treatment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Seizure. Volume 86(2021)
- Journal:
- Seizure
- Issue:
- Volume 86(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 86, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 86
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0086-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- 109
- Page End:
- 115
- Publication Date:
- 2021-03
- Subjects:
- Perampanel (PER) -- Focal-onset seizures (FOS) -- Focal to Bilateral Tonic-Clonic Seizures (FBTCS) -- Retention rate -- First add-on -- Late add-on
Epilepsy -- Periodicals
Epilepsy -- Periodicals
Seizures -- Periodicals
Épilepsie -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
Electronic journals
616.853 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.seizure-journal.com/ ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/13550306 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/10591311 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10591311 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals/seiz/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.01.019 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1059-1311
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8229.100000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25856.xml