Measuring the developmental relationship between memory ability and organization of a functional brain network vulnerable to Alzheimer's disease: Preliminary findings from the PRANK study. (31st December 2021) - Behm, Lillian
Abstract: Background: The hallmark memory impairments of typically presenting Alzheimer's disease (AD) are associated with pathological changes of the hippocampus. While it is known that the hippocampus is necessary for normal relational memory performance, the development of functional brain networks associated with the hippocampus is not well characterized, particularly in the periadolescent epoch. The development of the hippocampus and its associated functional brain network may be influenced by genetic, environmental, or other risk factors for AD, potentially creating vulnerabilities to AD in later life. This project explores the neurodevelopment of this hippocampal network to determine how individual differences in functional connectivity impact relational memory abilities during the periadolescent epoch. Here, we utilized preliminary data from the NIA‐funded Polygenic Risk of Alzheimer's Disease in Nebraska Kids (PRANK) study, which aims to improve insight regarding how brain and cognitive development is affected by polygenic risk for Alzheimer's disease. Our continuing study is recruiting healthy periadolescent individuals (8‐13 years of age). Here we report preliminary cross‐sectional findings from the PRANK study exploring how individual differences in hippocampal resting‐state functional connectivity (RSFC) covary with declarative/relational memory ability. Method: Analyses were conducted on preliminary data from healthy periadolescent participants (n=40). Declarative/relational memory performance was measured with Cambridge Cognition's Paired Associates Learning (PAL) task. Resting‐state functional MRI data was analyzed using a seed‐based approach with the bilateral hippocampus as the seed region of interest. RSFC data were analyzed to determine their covariance with relational memory ability (operationalized as PAL performance). Result: Our analysis revealed patterns of hippocampal RSFC that were broadly consistent with prior work, sharing the territory of the default mode network (DMN). We also observed regional covariance between hippocampal RSFC and performance on the PAL task. Conclusion: The present work describes preliminary findings of the ongoing PRANK study. Our preliminary observations are consistent with the perspective that hippocampal RSFC covaries with hippocampal‐dependent declarative/relation memory ability among periadolescent children. To understand whether this hippocampal network development is susceptible to genetic risk factors for AD, future work from the PRANK study will utilize participants' AD polygenic risk scores to determine whether those scores are related to individual differences of hippocampal RSFC.