Comparison of Pittsburgh compound‐B and flutemetamol white matter binding. (1st February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zeydan, Burcu; Schwarz, Christopher G.; Przybelski, Scott A.; Lesnick, Timothy G.; Kremers, Walter K.; Senjem, Matthew L.; Kantarci, Orhun H.; Min, Paul H.; Kemp, Bradley J.; Jack, Clifford R.; Kantarci, Kejal; Lowe, Val J.
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 17(2021)Supplement 4
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-02-01
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.050233
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: White matter (WM) 11 C‐Pittsburgh compound‐B (PiB) and 18 F‐Flutemetamol (FMT) uptake is increasingly being used as a reference region to calculate the standard uptake value ratios (SUVr) in longitudinal amyloid‐β PET studies. PiB uptake is lower in WM hyperintensities (WMH) in older adults. Furthermore, WM PiB uptake increases with aging. Our objective was to determine whether a similar variation in WM uptake exists with an 18 F‐ligand FMT. Method: A cohort of cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults with median (range) age of 67 (61, 83) years (N=31), and younger adults with median (range) age of 38 (30, 48) years (N=30) from the community responding to a study advertisement underwent MRI, PiB and FMT PET. MRI‐FLAIR images were segmented into WMH and normal appearing white matter (NAWM) and registered to the T1‐weighted image. PiB and FMT PET images were registered to the T1‐weighted image. PiB and FMT SUVrs from the WMH and NAWM compartments were calculated using cerebellar crus uptake as a reference. Result: WMH PiB SUVr and NAWM PiB SUVr were lower in the younger compared to the older adults (p<0.001). WMH FMT SUVr and NAWM FMT SUVr were lower in younger compared to older adults (p<0.001). PiB SUVr was lower than FMT SUVr both in younger and older adults in both WMH and NAWM compartments (p<0.001). In both age groups, PiB SUVr and FMT SUVr in WMH was lower than NAWM (p<0.001). AUROC analysis demonstrated no difference between PiB versus FMT SUVr in differentiating WMH from NAWM in younger and older adults. Conclusion: WMH and NAWM SUVRs are higher with FMT than PiB, however both PiB and FMT show a similar topographic pattern of uptake in the WM with higher uptake in NAWM compared to WMH. Aging is associated with a decrease in myelin integrity and increase of WMH volume. Higher WMH and NAWM PiB and FMT uptake in the older compared to younger adults suggests that additional aging‐related mechanisms are influencing WM PET tracer uptake. Age and WMH volume should be considered when WM uptake is used as a reference region for the evaluation of cortical uptake of both PiB and FMT.